#20 - MED - This effect is manifesting the Planetary Logos
Hello again, this is JLL coming at you with Gnostic Intel on the Internet. It's the 2nd of April 2017. This is installment 20. I mistakenly said that the previous installment 19 was the 20th.
And I'm here to tell you, to the best of my ability, how the Mandela Effect is manifesting the planetary logos. Now you might note, just in that assertion, just in the declaration of the intention for this talk that I am once again using Sophianic baby talk, that is to say, I'm talking in phonemes.
Logos, those are two phonemes, and they comprise a single word, Logos, whose meaning is to be explored in this talk. But those five letters, L-O-G-O-S, also describe the plural of another word. The word logo, when you make it a plural, is logos. So the simple fact of the matter here, without getting too tedious and pretending about it, the simple fact of the matter is that when your eyes scan the five letters L O G O S, what occurs in your mind, what arises in your mind, are 4 phonemes, lo go, log os.
Now, these four phonemes are extremely powerful acoustic devices by which the signal coming through the Mandela effect captures your synaptic circuits. Are you getting that yet? The synaptic circuitry the brain circuitry of the human animal is in capture by the Mandela effect. This is a paranormal event. This is an event of supernatural origin and supernatural purpose. And it is a wild delightful and totally unprecedented event in the great adventure of the human species on this planet.
The Gnostics called this event Sophia's Correction. Writing and teaching some two thousand years ago, previous to this moment, they foresaw the event of Sophia's correction. They saw it as seers, as shamans, which they were, intellectual shamans. They saw this event as something that would come to pass in the future. What I am saying to you is that Sophia's correction is happening now, and the Mandela effect is both the proof and implementation of that correction. And what is the correction of? What does the correction apply to?
It applies to what has gone wrong in the divine experiment on the planet Earth. That's all pretty simple. It sounds pretty simple to me. I don't know how it's coming across out there to you, but from what I'm reading in the comment section, I'd say I'm coming across pretty well. Now, hang on to your pajamas and pull up your socks because I'm going to go into a short exposition on the arcane subject of the planetary Logos. I'll do that in a moment, but first I'd like to make an observation which anybody who has taken an interest in the Mandela Effect could easily make, and I'm sure many of you have already made this observation.
Among the various examples and instances of the Mandela Effect, well, we have how many now? I mean, I hear various estimates from 200 to 2,000. Among those instances of the Mandela effect which are now in discussion, there are, I suggest, there are like 15 categories. And one of these categories is changes in corporate logos.
So, most prominently, certainly most foremost among these examples, you see the Volkswagen logo or emblem or medallion found on those automobiles and you see the Ford logo. They are certainly outstanding. They're certainly at the top of the list of changes in logos that bring your attention to the Mandela effect. Agreed? I think that's irrefutable. I think you'd all go along with me on that point. Hmm, Volkswagen logo, Ford logo. Hmmm, oh well.
We've looked at these logos, we've considered the difference in the way they are remembered by some people compared to the way they appear today. For instance, in the Volkswagen logo, the medallion or emblem that is metallically present on these automobiles, I remember and many people remember that the upper V and the lower double V, were joined into a single unit. Note I say double V instead of double U. That’s accurate, isn’t it?
So the upper V and the lower double V, which used to be a single and solid metallic unit, now have a gap between them. They're separated by a gap. Such is the Mandela effect regarding the Volkswagen logo. And many people, many, many people, thousands, who knows, hundreds of thousands, have attested to this effect.
The change in the Volkswagen logo has pinged the attention of many people. The occluded version, which I remember, has no gap. The current version has a gap, and when you look into the current record, it appears as if it has always been that way, and there never was a time when it was not so. However, there does exist significant residue or residual evidence of the occluded memory.
Bear in mind that I said in the introduction that it's really important to distinguish genuine cases of the Mandela effect from dubious or mistaken cases. To establish a genuine case, there must be verifiable residue and that is surely so with both these logos.
If everyone who comes to this effect with an enduring interest, giving it attention, pondering it, is going to be met by two facts, two facts that present themselves to your consciousness. The first fact is that you're continually repeating or reviewing the word logos. You're continually looking at the word logos, which is also the spelling of the word Logos. So, in fact, you're looking at the declaration of the Logos when you consider the Mandela shift of these two corporate emblems, aren't you? It could be said that the notion of the Logos, or the presence or power of the Logos is announcing itself to you through the two logos.
Second fact, and this is a very great fact indeed, the second fact that confronts you when you consider these two examples is this: the shift in this case is not merely a shift of spelling of a name, that is to say, something that could possibly be manipulated. It's really hard to conceive how it could be manipulated through the medium of the Internet and electronic media, but it's well-known fact that everything on the Internet is manipulated in one way or another, and so there could be a way, possibly, there could be a technology of changing the content on the internet so that words are spelled in different ways, so that movie dialogue is pronounced in a different way, the words are changed in the spoken dialogue, the words are spelled differently in the title of a product, or in a well-known name from some kind of, some area of popular culture like Looney Tunes.
There is a wide range of the reported effects that come to your attention, come to everyone's attention, through the Internet. That's an electronic medium, and everything in an electronic medium can be changed. However, the two cases, among there are others, but let's just consider these two, the two cases in which a corporate logo is changed, well, that's another story. Because if there exists in this world today, and it appears to be the case, engine blocks and machine blocks and car bodies that have upon them the residual form of the Volkswagen logo, well, that ain't something that can be done by algorithmic trickery on the internet, is it? That is material change.
The particular outstanding importance of these two logos, one factor of their importance is that they demonstrate that the power behind the Mandela Effect is capable of causing material change. Now, even with the Bible, which is a category in itself, if you see the word wolf in the Bible, where you thought it should be the word lion, and the lion shall lie down with a lamb, and the lion shall dwell with a lamb, and the wolf shall dwell with a lamb, these being well-known examples, of course.
If you find those examples on the internet by using a search machine, well, you're again in the realm of dubious phenomena, because it is possible, I suppose, that thousands upon thousands of people could be involved in cubicles, undertaking incredibly elaborate and tedious tasks in order to introduce algorithms that search out these passages everywhere they can be found on the internet and change them.
I suppose that's possible, but if someone goes into their personal library and pulls down an old volume that carries, let's say, the Hebrew-Greek interlinear of an English translation of the Old Testament, and they look at the book of Isaiah, and they see that in this book, which could have been published, say, 50, 60, 70 years ago, it says wolf instead of lion, and it says it not only in English but in Greek and Hebrew then you're looking at material change.
So there has been material change in the biblical scriptures and I'll get to that unique subject before too long, but right now I ask you to bring your attention to the material change of the metallic form of these corporate logos. Now I'm not going to force my views on you, and I'm not going to require that you view this matter as I do, but I can tell you right up front that I consider these irrefutable instances of material change to be proof that there is a supernatural agency behind the Mandela effect. That's just my view.
And rather than try to persuade you of that, which is perhaps a big step in your mind, after all, you're looking at the possibility that right before your eyes you are seeing material change introduced by a supernatural agency and you don't know if you don't know who or what that agency is well that's a pretty spooky situation right? So I'm going to proceed with a question, simple question that any child would ask.
Well, what kind of force could cause such material change in the physical world in which we live? What kind of force could change the metallic medallion attached to a Volkswagen vehicle so that it no longer has, it is no longer an integral unit but now it has a gap. What kind of force could put that gap into every single existing Volkswagen in the world today except those few which have been shown to have icons or logos without the gap? What force, what agency in the material world could possibly cause such a material change? Simple question, huh? Fair enough, right? So, Tak.
How about this? How about I say, just for the fun of it, that the answer is not far away. Because every time you look at the word logos and ponder this baffling phenomenon, well that very word in its singular form announces to you the cause of the phenomenon, the cause is the Logos, the planetary Logos. So, okay, what is the planetary Logos? Well, in the remaining seven minutes of this talk, I'll give you my best concise exposition.
In the first place, in terms of natural science, planetary Logos is a legitimate term for the material intelligence that operates through all the processes of nature on the planet. So the seasons, the nitrogen cycle, the production of argon in the atmosphere, the production and management of carbon dioxide, the production and the support of all the flora or plant life on the planet, of all the algae, of all the microscopic, omebic life and the anaerobic life, the production and support and management of all the fauna, all the animal life, all of this is the accomplishment of the planetary logos and it is a material accomplishment. It's all material. Go out and look at it. Everything is material.
The trees, the air is material, the oxygen, the gases in the air, it's all material. And this vast ensemble of material processes is informed, directed, and supported by the planetary logos. That is a legitimate definition of the term. So I ask you this question. If the planetary logos, so defined, can produce the change in the seasons so that you see a maple tree or an oak tree go through the cycles of the seasons, you see the sap rise in the tree. If the planet, it's the planetary logos that causes the sap to rise in the tree. It causes all of the mutations in the world of plants in the course of a year. It causes the tides to come and go. It causes the production of sedimentary rock and igneous rock, and it also causes the change in the form of those rocks. So if the planetary Logos is operating through the change in geological forms and the change in living forms, then don't you think that the planetary Logos, should it decide to do so, and should it direct its intention in that precise way, could not change the metallic medallion on every single automobile in this world? So I'll leave you with that question and I strongly advise you to stick to your natural senses and to the natural reasoning process by which you understand what happens in the material world around you. And don't go into wild speculation and conjecture in the attempt to understand how these material changes in the Mandala effect could occur.
Finally, I'll conclude with my short little five-minute exposition on the Gnostic angle on the planetary logos. So here goes. I have in my hand a thick volume, which is volume one, of the Coptic Gnostic Library, which can be found in five volumes. And if you want to put out, I don't know, $550, you can acquire this Scholar's Edition, which gives the Coptic text on the left-hand page and the English translation on the right-hand page and which contains translations not found in the popular edition of the Nag Hammadi material, the Nag Hammadi library in English. It contains other translations and it contains very extensive commentaries.
Now in this corpus of Gnostic material, the Nag Hammadi, which is part of the background material you use to decode the synoptic clues, remember, in this material there is extensive passages, there are extensive passages, describing the Aeon Sophia as a divinity or galactic entity at the center of our galaxy. And the Nag Hammadi codices are the primary source of the story of what happened to Sophia, the sacred narrative of the mysteries, which I call the fallen goddess scenario.
So there are plenty of passages where Sophia is named as the principal character in this creation myth, as it would technically be called, although it's more properly an emanation myth. So, almost all the cosmological myths from Nag Hammadi explicitly name Sophia as the principal character in the story. But there is one particular text I'm looking at right here. It's called the Tripartite Tractate. It's one of the longest cosmological texts in the Nag Hammadi books. It's very dense, it's very abstruse, and it also presents a cosmological scenario which is parallel to the scenario in which Sophia, the star goddess Sophia, is the principal actor and agent.
So, what is particularly interesting about the tripartite tractate is that it doesn't use the name Sophia, which is found lavishly through many of the other treatises from Nag Hammadi, especially the cosmological treatises, such as the Hypostasis of the Archons, the On the Origin of the World, and the Apocryphon of John. In those cosmological treatises, you find the name Sophia written everywhere. It's obviously about her. The principal narrative is the story of how she turned into the earth, how she designed the human species, and many, many other things.
But now take a look for a moment at the tripartite tractate. It contains parallel passages of cosmology but instead of calling the principal agent of the story Sophia, it uses the Greek word Logos. So, in fact, it substitutes the name and the action of the planetary Logos for Sophia.
Now in the Scholars edition that I'm looking at right now, the long commentary on the Tripartite Tractate was written by Attridge and Pagels. That would be Elaine Pagels. She's a very well-known Gnostic scholar. In fact, I've met Elaine Pagels, and I had the pleasure to deliver a seminar with her on Gnosticism at the Marian Institute in November of 2001.
So in conclusion, to prove to you that equating Sophia with the planetary Logos is not merely my caprice, I am going to quote what these two scholars say in their long commentary, Attridge, and Tagles, whom I have met personally. They say that Valentinian texts, that's a certain school of Gnosticism, use the name Logos for an Aeon or god from the Pleroma or Galactic core, and that it is clear from the texts that this Logos entity can be seen, “to perform the same functions as Sophia in the full myth.”
I rest my case. Sophia, the divine mother of the human species, your mother, the planetary animal mother, is the planetary Logos. It is her power that sustains and directs all the material processes in nature, and so I would deem her capable of producing those material changes such as occur in the metallic logos demonstrating the Mandela effect.
And with that assertion, I will sign off for now. Until the next time, and in the meanwhile, may your attention be rewarded by the truth.