#21 - MED - Gaia Sophia calls you to her correction
Hello again, it's JLL with Gnostic Intel on the internet. It's the 3rd of April 2017. In the title of this installment, which is number 21, is “Gaia Sophia Calls You to Her Correction”.
What I intend to do in this installment is to talk more or less loosely, conversationally, about the background of where I'm coming from, the background of this investigation, and to provide some general orientation to the process underway.
In doing so, I want to start out with a reference back to the preceding talk about the planetary logos. I am trusting that there actually are representations of the Volkswagen medallion and representations of the Ford logo in material form, showing the occluded memory. For instance, I'm trusting that there are Volkswagen medallions that people have found them without the gap between the upper V and the lower double V.
Now, I myself haven't found one of those, but I have seen people on the internet whom I trust, whom I have no reason to believe would be deceiving me, who show me photographic evidence that they have found the occluded version of the logo. ok?
Of course, material evidence is really important in genuine cases of the Mandela effect, as I've said. And the best case scenario is that you can confirm material evidence on your own. For instance, if you went through an old book collection and you found a paperback copy of the book by Anne Rice and the title says “Interview with a Vampire”, a vampire, then that is material residue of the occluded memory.
The current record, for the most part, on the internet, and even the current record of books existing in print today, presents the title “Interview with the Vampire”. So, you know what material evidence is. It's a common sense matter. It's nothing mysterious or occult about it at all. So when I say that the planetary Logos, also known as the Aeon Sophia, is capable of producing such material changes, I'm trusting in the people who are presenting the evidence of those changes, even though I'm not meeting these people in real life so far, and I'm relying on what they say on the internet.
However, I can report that in the last couple of days I have had the occasion to stumble upon material evidence of the Mandela effect. This concerns the effect noted in the name of the manufacturer of farm equipment, John Deere. Now it's my memory that it was always spelled D-E-E-R-E, and I certainly have a vivid recall of farm machinery, massive devices with huge wheels six feet tall turning around in the countryside both in the United States and in Europe and Belgium and in Germany with the name John Deere, spelled D-E-E-R-E, that is with the final E, spelled out on the sides of these massive farm vehicles?
Well, I happen to be in a feed store and farm supply store somewhere in Middle Europe a couple of days ago, just inquiring about something, and I turned and looked off to the side and there was a small tractor there of the kind that's used for minor farming activities, kind of like the tractor you would use for the garden at the back of your house, you know what I mean, and clearly written against a pale green background of the motor casing of this tractor, it said John Deere, spelled with a final E. Well that is my first experience of direct, firsthand, material evidence of the Mandela shift.
The current record shows, if you look on the internet, that the name of the company is spelled without the final E, and presumably there are thousands and thousands of pieces of equipment circulating around on the planet on various farms which are spelled without the E now. So both the occluded form and the current or occluding form of the name are present in material reality and I'm happy to say that I experienced that in the presence of another person just a couple of days ago. I experienced that instance of proof.
Now, while we're on the subject of corporate logos, I do emphasize once again that the Ford and the Volkswagen logos stand side by side as paramount examples of the Mandela effect. Now I shall have quite a bit to say about the message coming through those two logos in the near future. For right now, I just want to mention that there is some discussion about the Volvo logo, the circle emblem of those Swedish cars of the manufacturer Volvo.
Now I can't honestly remember whether or not the Volvo logo, which is a circle, had an arrow coming out of it in the upper right hand area that is to say around the one o'clock position. I can't remember if it had an arrow or not, but apparently it did not have an arrow and now it has an arrow or else it had an arrow and now it doesn't. You see, one thing I'd like to point out is that once the cosmic agency that is producing this effect gains your attention, once she pings your attention by this trick, it doesn't matter ultimately which was the original version.
I'm not attached to the fact that I remember “Interview with a Vampire”, and I don't consider everyone else who, everyone who says, no, it was never that, it's always been “Interview with the Vampire”, I don't consider them as to be a benighted lot of people that I reject and ridicule. As far as I'm concerned, what's interesting is the way that our attention is mutually brought to the signal.
So I can't say whether the Volvo emblem in the past had an arrow coming off it or not. But I can say this, there is a content contained, there is a clue embodied, embedded in the Volvo logo. If it is indeed another example of material change, such as the Volkswagen logo, well that's remarkable. But whether or not that is the case, the Volvo logo by the name Volvo contains a particular message. That message repeats and complements or reinforces, yeah that's the word, it reinforces the message of the almond shock. Why is that? Quite simply because of the word Fulvo and what it means in the ancient Icelandic language. Now in Latin it just means I roll. OK? Hence it belongs to the word revolve, revolution, to roll, I roll.
But actually the word Volvo is very close to the Icelandic language which is Scandinavian. Sweden is a Scandinavian country. Now if you look it up on the internet you'll find that the name Volvo converts in Icelandic to Vulva and it’s the name for a witch, a female shaman, and particularly for one who speaks oracles. And of course, this is a way to decode the Mandela effect by going into other material, in this case the body or repertoire of world mythology, in order to detect the references in the Mandela instances, right?
And as a comparative mythologist, I already knew this, so I didn't have to go to the internet and search for the word. But if you do that, if you go and pull it up on Wikipedia, well, some remarkable connotations will jump right out at you. For one thing, it says under the entry VO with two dots over the O meaning it’s pronounced Voo LVA. Voolva is thus the Icelandic word signaled by the Volvo logo. And what does the entry say? Well, get this, the Voolur were referred to by many names. Old Norse, Volva means wand carrier or carrier of a magic staff. Wasn't that remarkable? Considering that the debate or discussion around the change in the Volvo icon, in the emblem of the car, concerns the presence of an arrow, a phallic type arrow, extending from the circle, a wand, a magic staff. And the passage continues to say that a Spakona or speaking woman, Spakwoman, is a witch or Shamaness who is specialized in seeing things in the supernatural world and delivering oracles. Well, how cool is that?
Couldn't it be said that the Mandela effect is an oracular phenomenon? Oracles are coming through these effects, oracular messages. And what is the source of these messages? Well it is the vulva and what is the vulva? Well that's exactly the equivalent of the English word for the female organs of generation and what is the vulva? Well it's the almond, it's the vesica piscis, it is the telluric womb of the earth goddess.
So there you have it. I would consider that the Mandela effect manifesting in the Volvo logo is a reinforcement of the message of the Almond Shock, taken from the nominative instance of the effect. The process that you undergo in your mind as you work through this investigation, as you ponder the Mandela effect and the array of the many different signals, that process is Mythophrenia.
Mythophrenia is not Schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is a disordered and imbalanced state of psychic receptivity to signals operating through the mind and imagination. But Mythophrenia is the sober and steady navigation through that field of signals. So each time that you listen to me expound on a Mandela effect, I am taking you on a Mythophrenic journey. This is a journey rich with meaning and learning. It enriches your imagination and at the same time it disciplines you to use your imagination in a sane way, in a sober way, and in a directed way.
So, instead of flitting about through a range of disordered associations, going into what is technically called a Schizophrenic fugue state, I am actually taking you through a Mythophrenic fugue state. And learning how to recognize Mythophrenia and handle it and navigate it, navigate in the fugue state, of associations of words and images, is the beginning of the super-learning event. Tak.
In the sense I'm proposing here, Mythophrenia is an art form, and the skills required for that art form, the primary skill, is mantik, that is the technique of divination. You see, there's no spirituality anymore, you can't get away with calling yourself spiritual unless you can prove that you have the skills that would presumably go along with that presumption, you see. And the primary skill is divinatory skill. So, mantik is the art of divination, and to become mantic is to become skilled in divination. And that is what I propose as the alternative to the terms spirituality and spiritual.
Now I'd like to talk a little bit about this notion of Sophia's correction and the background, the deep background, of this concept. In the first place, you need to be perfectly clear that I have not invented the notion of Sophia's correction. It can be found in the Nag Hammadi writings. It is a theme stated, although it is a rare theme and it is only stated in about three different places in the surviving materials. But bear in mind that the surviving materials of the Greek Coptic writings from Nag Hammadi are merely a fragment of a vast body of literature that existed at one time due to the massive output of the teachers of the mystery schools, who call themselves telestai, those who are aimed. That is what they called themselves and this telestic science of Gnosis which was founded on the narrative of the goddess Sophia produced a vast amount of material, almost all of which has been destroyed.
And so the notion of Sophia's correction survives in the remaining material, and it's possible that there was a great deal more written about it in ancient times which has been lost. The exact word that you find in those Nag Hammadi materials is a Greek word, diarthosis. I would point out, by the way, that Coptic is kind of a made-up language. It was invented, I think, around the year 100 A.D. and one in every four or five words in Coptic is actually borrowed from Greek. That's called a loanword.
So the word for Sophia's correction in Coptic is actually a Greek word, which consists of the prefix di-, which means division or dual, and orthosis. Orthosis means an adaptation. So you could translate it also as a dual adaptation or a two-way solution or a two-way adjustment. There are various ways of translating diarthosis, but the favorite way that I have used now for a good many years is correction.
So there's a correction taking place in the divine experiment and the correction is being performed by the originator of that experiment, the goddess Sophia herself, the wisdom goddess. And what the name, what the Greek name for the correction tells you is that the correction has two aspects and that can be interpreted in various ways but for right now consider it this way: it is Sophia's correction. It is the correction of the planetary logos itself.
The planetary logos, the intelligence that runs all the natural and material processes on this planet, is correcting itself, but it is doing it in a two-fold manner. Part of its correction is completely independent of the human species. Another part of its correction is dependent upon or calls upon human participation. So the planetary animal mother, the directing agency of the Earth, of the entire Earth right now, is making her correction in part on her own terms, that is to say on the planetary level, way beyond anything in which human beings can be involved. But her correction is also developing in a dimension where human involvement is possible, is desirable from the point of view of Sophia. She calls you to her correction.
Now I have used the term Gaia Sophia in the title of this talk. It's a compound term that I coined a number of years ago, or I should say that I coined a number of years ago, if you can catch that difference. And by coining this term, what did I intend to do? Well, I intended to show that the entire mythological narrative inherited from the Mysteries, which centers on this divine goddess figure, Sophia, is perfectly compatible with the modern-day theory of the Gaia hypothesis. You may have heard about the Gaia hypothesis, or you may not. Go check it out, if you haven't.
It's a remarkable fact that the Gaia hypothesis was proposed by two people, James Lovelock, a British scientist, and Lynn Margulis, an American evolutionary biologist. I can also say happily that I had the occasion to meet Lynn Margulis, the mother of the Gaia hypothesis, or what is now called Gaia Theory, and I talked with her in the United States when my book, Not in His Image, came out in November of 2006. And I also saw her on a number of other occasions, one time in Barcelona, Spain, when she was visiting there and giving a lecture. So I had the pleasure to know Lynn Margulis, just as I had the pleasure to know the most widely known Gnostic scholar, Elaine Pagels.
So Lovelock and Margulis brought out the Gaia hypothesis as it was called upon its introduction, and it’s a remarkable fact that they did so around the middle of the 1970s, at the very same time that the first full English translation of the Nag Hammadi writings appeared. This translation is the NHLE, The Nag Hammadi Library in English, edited by James Robinson.
In that edition, full English translation of the 52 documents found at Nag Hammadi came out within a few years of the Gaia hypothesis. What a wonderful coincidence. So I show throughout many passages in my book, Not in his Image, that the Gaia hypothesis, which states that the earth is a living, self-regulating super-organism conscious of its own activities and able to direct them teleologically is totally compatible with the assertions that Gnostics made about the Aeon Sophia who is said to be the Pleromic or Galactic Divinity who turned into the Earth.
So you have the perfect marriage of science and mythology in the term Gaia-Sophia. I should also point out, by the way, that I am a mythologist. I'm a comparative mythologist, and when I use the word myth, I do not use it in a derogatory sense of a superstitious or deceptive account of something. The pure and simple basic definition of myth is simply that it is a narrative, but it is a particular kind of narrative. It is a narrative about power.
It is a description of how certain powers operate in the world. So myth is a Mythopoetic description, for instance, of how the power of the earth functions, and as such, it is totally compatible with a scientific description such as you find in the Gaia hypothesis. Now as I'm wrapping this up, hey, it's 45 minutes here, but this is kind of conversational, so I think I'll just drift along here for a moment. It's really hard to keep it to 20 or 25 minutes, but I'm going to get it down there. It's a discipline for me. It's a challenge. I'm intrigued to see if I can do it. But right now I'm rambling a little bit, so bear with me while I ramble on.
As I told friends and associates at the time in the United States when Meta-History went online in 2002, and then later when I was writing Not in His Image, as I told my associates at that time, well, there is this rare, highly esoteric notion called diarthosis in the Gnostic writings. And so there is a theme here, but it's only a clue. It's just a clue because the surviving writings don't say what her correction is.
So I took the position, cautious position, because I am a cautious and rigorous scholar in my own way, although I have absolutely no credibility or standing among conventional or academic scholars of Gnosticism, but I have my own standards that I follow. I was very cautious about saying anything about what correction is, and so I didn't speculate.
Gnostics do not speculate. You don't need to speculate. You don't need to run down rabbit holes and wear your mind to a frazzle by pondering over all kinds of unsupported possibilities. Remember I said to you that I talk to you on the internet for one simple purpose. I want to reach you and make sense. Now I ask you, we are 21 installments into Mandela effect decoded: am I making sense about the origin and operation of this baffling phenomenon? Am I making sense of it compared to others who are simply running around from one ping to the next? They're noting the pings, but what are they making of the pings? What are they making of the message coming through the Mandela effect once she has caught your attention by a ping?
Well, as far as I can tell they're not making anything of it. There's a general speculation that it has something to do with an awakening. Well an awakening of who? And an awakening to what? When you awaken you awaken to something. Well I'm saying that it's a wake up call to Sophia’s correction. That’s how I’m making sense of it, you see. Also, to get back to the important concept that the diarthosis or diarthosis has two features or two factors, let me elaborate a little bit more on that point.
One way to interpret it, as I just said, is that part of the correction process proceeds completely on Sophia's terms. She accomplishes certain aspects of the correction totally on her own. Would you like to have an example? My pleasure to give you one. In fact, I'll double the pleasure and I'll give you two. These are two instances of what the Earth itself is doing as a living super-organism to correct the problem that humanity faces on Earth.
In the first instance, the Aeon Sophia is bleaching out the infection in the Petri dish. She's bleaching out the mold. Now this mold can be described in various ways. It is most definitely a parasitic infection of the human brain that attacks the amygdala, Toxoplasmosis. Now I emphasize, because I am presenting a Gnostic investigation and I’m offering you the benefit of Gnostic intel, which is of a unique and superior kind of intel, and I am telling you that this infection is of an alien origin. It's an alien off-planet virus that got vectored into the human neurological system. And there will be a talk somewhere up along the line in the course of 64 uploads in which I will explain exactly how this alien Archontic virus found its way into the human brain and when it did.
There is however another way to consider the mold in the Petri dish. You can say that due to the Archontic deviance of the human brain, the human species has really screwed up the environment and it has overpopulated the world with degenerate specimens of the Anthropic genome.
So, in the view of the Aeon Sophia, it's necessary to clean out the Petri dish. And to do this, she uses a bleaching process, and to, what is the word, implement the bleaching process, she uses the sun. Now many people have observed that the sun has changed in the last 15 or 20 years, and that it's acting very strangely. People have observed that the light of the sun has become like harsh and white, like a harsh enamel. You know what the glare of enamel is like? Well, that glare is coming from the sun. But, paradoxically, the sun in its normal cycle of activity should be at a solar maximum, and it should not be behaving in some of the ways it’s behaving right now.
So the color of the sun has changed, even the position of the sun in the sky, according to some people, including the Inuits of Greenland, has changed. There are baffling anomalies connected with the behavior of the sun, aren’t there? Well these indicate that the Aeon Sophia, who works very closely with the solar logos of the sun, and that is described in the Gnostic narrative, is using the sun to bleach out the mildew or mold in the Petri dish of the planetary laboratory. So there is a bleaching process taking place and to a certain degree that bleaching process actually extends into the circuits of the human brain.
It's a mysterious process. You can't totally understand what the Aeon Sophia at the planetary level is doing, but I can assure you that the anomalies in the behavior of the Sun, the quiescence, the remarkable, inexplicable, quiescence of sunspots at a time of a solar maximum and other factors which have been widely noted by people reporting independently on the internet, are all evidence of the measures that Sophia is taking on her own terms to achieve her correction.
Now, there's a second instance of what she's doing above and beyond any human participation and indeed above and beyond the knowledge of the vast majority of human beings on the planet. In August of 2014, I gave a talk on red ice on the subject of the Archontic infection. And at that time, the first week of August 2014, I was contemplating or reflecting upon some Gnostic intel that I had received, some shamanic intel. Now shamans, particularly Gnostic shamans who use the the Telestic method, can learn things about what is happening with the planet that are not accessible to ordinary knowledge. So I have access to non-ordinary knowledge.
That's my claim. I put it right out in the open and I make no bones about it. There's nothing particularly extraordinary about that claim. All genuine shamans in all cultures throughout the world in all times have had access to non-ordinary knowledge. And according to the non-ordinary knowledge that I received in August of 2014, which interestingly is the month that the film Lucy came out, the planetary logos, who directs all material processes on the planet, and also directs the atmospheric processes around the planet, generated a double event.
First event, I think, was 18 days long, then there was a pause of about 12 days, as I recall, and the second event was 28 days long. So this event in total extended pretty much through August and September of 2014. And what did the Divine Mother, the Aeon Sophia, do during that period?
Well, she emitted from the material core of the planet two bursts of UTI, that is, unpulsed teluric infrasound, I-N-F-R-A, infrasound. Unpulsed teluric infrasound. Unpulsed means that the sound, and it is a sonic acoustic sound that she emitted from her body, as if she were pronouncing a mantra, is unpulsed. It has no modulation. It is like one continuous note with no modulation. Then there was a break. And then again, for 28 days, concluding around the 24th of September, as I recall, there was a second burst of UTI. Why did she do this? This is something that she did for her correction in the scale of her life and actions, which is far beyond anything that human beings can be involved in. OK?
She did that in order to establish in the upper atmosphere of the planet, at an altitude of about 600 miles, a massive protective shield. She needs to shield the planet from certain factors in the solar system which were operating against her correction, and that is what she did. Namely, she established, using sound, she established a protective shield against the microwave radiations proceeding from the Archons.
Now, the Archons are the extraterrestrial parasites who intruded upon this experiment. The Archons are a big problem in the divine experiment on Earth. Sophia is correcting the problem of the Archons on her own terms by herself and because it is a dimorphic solution, she is calling you to correct the problem of the Archons as it presents itself in the realm of human society, human communication, and human behavior across the planet.
You might recall that I said that I happen to be the individual who introduced the term Archon to the Internet, And when I speak of the Archons now, as I did 15 years ago, I always speak of these entities in the framework of the Gnostic narrative. Therefore everything that I say about them, such as what I'm telling you right now, is firmly based on the framework of the Gnostic narrative. It’s not speculation, fabulation, conjecture, or invention.
Unfortunately, many of the people who have picked up this term, such as Jay Widener, whom some consider to be an expert on the Archons, is seriously misrepresenting these entities and their operation upon the earth and upon the human mind. So I advise you who are taking part in this investigation with me to stick to that description of the Archons which belongs within the framework of the Sophianic narrative, the fallen goddess scenario.
So there you have it. There are two things that Sophia is doing independently of us. Now there's another way to describe or to spin the notion of diarthosis. I've said that there is a degree of human participation in Sophia's correction, right? True, but that's a choice that comes before humanity. It's a choice that comes before every human animal who has the good fortune to encounter that choice.
Now, if you're one of those animals, then you're in a position to recognize that the brutal fact is that some part of humanity is not going to be involved in Sophia’s correction. And I'm going to tell you what happens to that part of humanity. There's a word. I used this word in an article I wrote for Red Ice about Pepe the frog. I used it in relation to the midwife toad. It is a term from biology, it is a term from the womb of nature, and that term is apoptosis.
A-P-O-P-T-O-S-I-S. Apoptosis, defined as the death of cells which occurs as a normal and controlled part of an organism's growth or development. So apoptosis is the shedding of cells in a healthy process of growth. The molting or sloughing off of dead cells. Your body is continually in a state of apoptosis to the degree that you are continually shedding skin. The skin of a human person is continually regenerating and the skin dries off and flakes off in minuscule particles in a constant process of apoptosis.
So in Sophia's correction, which is a biological event on a planetary scale, among other things, it's also a psychic event, it's an intra-psychic event, it's a unique phenomenon in your own mind, it's an imaginative event, it encompasses many dimensions. But as a biological event, it implies the sloughing off of part of the human species. That is the part that will not be incorporated into the regenerated organism of her correction.
Now, that's quite a statement, I know, and the implications of that statement are bound to be disturbing to some people. I know that as well. But here I am at the conclusion of this rather rambling and conversational episode where I have indulged myself and allowed myself to go on for 45 minutes and I'm going to rest and stop at this point because this is a pretty big deal that I'm putting across to you here. But something tells me that to some of you, it’s not going to be a big surprise at all.
So, I'll leave it at that. I'll just conclude with a restatement along the lines of the title here. The planetary super-organism in which you live as a cell, calls you to its correction process. How does it do that? Well, it's using a really strange weird phenomenon called the Mandela Effect. In the array of signals coming through this effect, the planetary Logos is informing you and instructing you of her correction and what you need to do to be involved.
Now this is a great opportunity needless to say, I mean is that not the understatement of the year? But it is a challenge and it is also a responsibility. There is a certain responsibility for entering the super-learning event and becoming an instrument of Sophia's correction in human society. There is a particular requirement that she makes of you, and I'm not making this up. I intend to show you how she states that requirement in the array of signals that are encoded in these various effects.
There is a narrative aspect to the Mandela effects. There is a key narrative that plays a role in this phenomenon and that narrative determines whether or not you can undertake the responsibility for this great and sublime opportunity.
So, bear that in mind, be assured that I will get explicitly to that narrative, which I'm going to call the Mandela narrative, and everything will be as clear as crystal as this investigation proceeds. I thank you for your participation, for subscribing to my channel, for the sobriety and civility of your comments, and until the next time, may your attention be rewarded by the truth.