The title for this post was inspired by Elena’s OBE, clip below.
Of course, as the pastor said, Elena must be under the influence of demons, since the pastor didn’t authorize her vision. But we’re supposed to believe everything attributed to Paul (eg vision of Jesus in Acts 9), when forgeries and fraudsters abounded then, as now, in every area of life?
“And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure”. (2 Corinthians 12:7, KJV)
Hmmm….Paul admits to unverifiable visions and also admits to being attacked by Satan, but puts a positive spin on his experiences, and we’re NOT supposed to question any of this? Who gets to judge what experiences are demonic in a negative way (ie the pastor’s judgment of Elena’s experience) versus demonic in a positive way (ie Paul’s judgment of his own experience)?
Ah, the pastor of course. Turn your mind off. Believe/follow the “authority” over you, because you are NOT allowed to be your own authority. I smell a rat……
My friend Elena comes on screen at 16:13. For full context, click button below:
Revisiting my answer to Stephana’s question near the beginning, since my computer stuttered:
Stephana mentioned discerning evidence/facts for truth versus opinions. Thanks for making me think, Stephana, because good answers are often NOT always so black and white. Since Stephana said she loves “myths as truth”, such as Star Wars, and various other allegories, click button below for something that is 100% true, with mostly only intuitive evidence/facts to support:
She mentioned how we met through Mark Passio’s work, who is against solipsism. I don’t adhere to the strict definition of solipsism, as it is unfalsifiable. I created a word called truman-atrix, which could be considered as describing a nuanced version of solipsism.
Then Stephana specifically asked me, “Is truth discovered or is it created?” I started to say a bit of both, but then my computer stuttered.
For those who want to know how I answered, I attempted to briefly explain some of my main ideas about the truman-atrix. For more detailed information (…in addition to the above button…), please check out:
As my readers can probably sense, I like Riz’s way of thinking and have learned much from him.
In the conflict with her son, Stephana claimed “two things cannot occupy the same space”. I’m only a layman when it comes to quantum physics, but my understanding is that our quantum reality allows for many things to occupy the same space.
An imperfect example might be: there are many EMF waves around you right now, such as AM radio waves, FM too, wifi, etc ... Yes, I know they don’t occupy the exact same space, as they exist in different frequencies, not the same space. The example is a rough estimate, because from the human perception point of view, it seems that they occupy the same space around you.
But if wacky quantum mechanics can be believed, such things as quantum entanglement are true and imply at least “two things occupying the same space”.
Why not more?
Quantum computers are currently being perfected. The traditional computer bit is replaced by a quantum bit, called a Q-bit. A Q-bit can exist in two different measurable spin states at the same time. A spin in one direction represents the traditional computer bit for true (1) AND CAN ALSO exist in the opposite spin state at the same time, to represent the traditional computer bit for false (0).
Something can be true and false at the same time?
Actually, in computer logic, with 2 check conditions, there are 4 possible mathematical combinations:
True (1) with false (0)
False (0) with true (1) (…it works a little different from commonsense human understanding […where we think #2 and #1 should be the same…]—->false with true can equate to different computer instructions executing versus true with false)
True (1) with true (1)
False (0) with false (0)
It gets a little mind boggling, but apparently I can exist in my own independent universe AND I CAN ALSO exist in yours, at the same time, where you also have your own independent universe. Sort of like my computer screen shows this article on my display (my independent computer-universe) AND ALSO you see the same article on your display (your independent computer-universe). So, we have a shared reality too…sort of.
The rub is: the bits and bytes on my computer are totally different (…from a physical hardware perspective…) than the bits and bytes on your computer.
Or, are they? Is that only the appearance of things?
If our understanding of the implications of quantum entanglement is correct, the Q-bits and Q-bytes in my universe are exactly the same as yours. Hence, we are all One, the very concept Stephana is really questioning these days from Scientology; she believed it once and thought it was true.
Well, as I wrote before, there are 2 check conditions:
Stephana’s old belief that All are One
Whether or not this idea is accurate
In traditional computer-math logic, 2 check conditions make 4 possible combinations:
Stephana believes we are All One (1), and indeed, we are All One (1)
Stephana believes we are All Separate (0), and yet, we are All One (1)
Stephana believes we are All One (1), but we are All Separate (0)
Stepana believes we are All Separate (0), and indeed, we are All Separate (0)
To complicate things more, the double-slit experiment implies quantum reality exists as something more like a wave, until quantum-consciousness focuses sufficient observational power to cause/force the wave to become observable particles. But even then, the Q-bit particles exist as the opposite state, at the same time.
In other words, informational reality (…the wave…) contains ALL possibility, as David Icke often says. Observational reality (…the particles…) contains ONE manifested reality, while also containing the exact opposite unmanifested spin-state reality within those particles. However, if it’s true that particles are simply another form of wave, then ultimately ALL possibility ALWAYS exists in potentia, since that is the natural state of the wave.
That’s another way of saying, “Anything is possible, and change in any direction is possible, and change can happen instantly, as if by magic!”
Note: Don’t get me started on the rapture!
If Rocky can inspire instant change in imagination-land, then I think we can too!
Ending with an interesting Gnostic take on Dark City, which has some applicability to this article
I won’t comment much on the above video, except to say I agree with much of the narrator’s explanations. However, he says the powerful aliens lose to a single man who simply remembers what he is?
Nonsense!
If my readers have watched the movie, s/he will remember Murdoch received something like supernatural help, from a former alien collaborator; Murdoch learned to develop his “tuning” (…telekinesis…) ability, over a lifetime, inside an illusory time-dilated reality, which only seemed like seconds in so-called “true alien reality”.
When he faced the aliens again, he knew what he was doing, and had ALL power at his disposal. He could tune better than the aliens, and used that greater power (…motivated by self-defensive love, NOT FEAR, for himself and ALL humans…) to kill them ALL, because that was the only way to bring light to Dark City.
Note: this scene possibly speaks to overwhelming power YOU must blast Archons with after death, literally killing them all, for the sake of bringing light to a unique universe you will create for yourself and your loved ones. Can you say, “Birth of a new Big Bang universe?”
If I’m in the Truman-atrix, I’m the only true “God” that can defeat the “Dark City aliens”. If I’m in the Truman-atrix-plus, I will need your help, fellow Avengers.
In my “doctor” state of mind, I can think rationally and write about deep topics such as this article. But with what is going on in this “reality”, I’m always angry! I’ve learned to control it…just barely… but I know how to let that control go instantly.
In that other cognitive state of mind, I can still recognize & assist my friends, but I can only understand very simple instructions. Leader types in my group understand and respect that.
What is the ultimate answer to Stephana’s initial question at the beginning of the video: Is truth discovered or created?
Firstly, thanks again, Stephana for forcing me to think much to answer this question!
I came across the Spinoza video below, that explains better than I could. 17th century philosopher Baruch Spinoza intuited things like evolution before Darwin even penned his famous book. His work helped launch Biblical criticism to begin to liberate humanity from a certain level of religious mind control enslavement.
In his day, people were burned at the stake for far less than the words Spinoza wrote on paper; even without that threat, we all know people who are very religiously indoctrinated. What mysterious power does religion have that captures the soul?
I pulled out the last few minutes of the Spinoza video, to highlight what Spinoza thought about fact versus truth, AND truth discovered versus truth created.
Spinoza helped mankind come to understand: religion = imagination = myth = important. For the full Spinoza video, click below.
Click image below for my own imaginative, mythical, story that is a barometer of the worldwide spiritual atmosphere; it has many green links that go into more detail, but if one can easily breathe in the essence of what I’m trying to say, the Schumann resonance is increasing!
Final, final, simple answer: facts are what the 5 senses can detect, but everything else (…including cognitive interpretation of said facts…) falls into the realm of truth versus lies, and requires developing discernment & research & interpretative abilities to decide all things for oneself.
Note: I’d also say Truth = moral messaging that transcends time and remains true eternally, BUT facts = often associated with interpretations that are changeable and updatable with new information, and open to ongoing interpretation.
Poetic & mythological & philosophical meaning is pure Truth and everything else is evolving facts!
Bonus audio about discerning factual evidence re: Anunnaki versus what is eternally True & meaningful about the evidence.
