I joined Stephana & Ryder today, in discussing Mark Passio’s work. Click button below for my other substack re: my derivative substack, based on Mark’s work.
I have been including Stephana & Ryder’s commentary into my transcriptions of Mark’s podcast series; click HERE to jump right to their very first video!
We agreed Mark’s presentation style can be rather intense and/or negative; he freely admits this before every formal presentation. I can usually look beyond it, focusing instead on the truth(s) revealed……but it can even bog me down sometimes.
I think Mark is definitely a polarizing figure. He has a lot of really good foundational stuff, but he can lean hard into the “us versus them” energy, which can feel like a black pill if you’re not ready for it. I’m not sure if it’s intentional controlled opposition, but I do think he attracts a certain type of energy that can be intense.
We decided to take a break from coordinating the podcast transcriptions, for now anyway.
Questions to my readers:
Do you agree Mark’s work and/or presentation style is too difficult to process sometimes?
Does everybody feel a need to take a break from Passio-style information/communication sometimes, or is it just us???
Please feel free to leave comments regarding this dilemma, and also Professor Jiang’s rationalizations/justifications below.
Professor Jiang usually seems pretty smart, but is he totally correct, in the video below?
He claims that the masses NEED to be programmed with ideas about right and wrong & truth and justice, OR ELSE society would collapse into chaos! I think that Mark would say the good professor is under mind control. Or, does Prof Jiang make good points?
Is Jiang a victim of chaos sorcery mind control AND worldview poisoning mind control? Does the professor buy into the “authority program” too much, as a good and necessary thing? He does seem to understand (as Mark emphasizes too) that fear of abandonment by tribe (ie symbolically, the alpha male father figure) is the deepest subconscious fear that people have.
But how to leverage that realization to its fullest extent? Perhaps Jiang’s recommendations are simply a stepping stone to something deeper that Originator-Creator-Oversoul has for Sophia?
Can we truly reprogram ourselves in 30 days, following the professor’s plan below?
Pause moral judgment with narratives (week 1).
Stop asking who’s right and start asking how systems function (week 2).
Detach identity from belief (week 3).
Argue opposite views even if you don’t believe them at first???
Practice strategic silence (week 4).
