#29 - MED - Mother hack, divine mischief on the internet
Hello again, this is JLL coming at you with Gnostic Intel on the internet. It is, and this time I'm not kidding, it is the 15th of April, Saturday, 2017.
And I'm here to talk to you about divine mischief on the internet. Now to start out I'd like to tell you something which I consider to be extremely wonderful. And it would please me to know that I could maybe in some way make your day by what I'm going to tell you now. And I’m pretty sure you haven't heard it before. I mean that may sound like an arrogant and self-important claim, but let's see if I can stand by that claim.
I discovered this principle, if you call it that, a good many years ago in my studies of Hindu Tantra, Hindu Tantric cosmology which is to be distinguished from Buddhist tantra. And I was probably about 20-21 years old when I registered this proposition in my mind.
So that's coming forward now a good 50 years in time. I've lived with this proposition through all those years and it delights me to tell you exactly what it is in one simple sentence. The myriad worlds in the universe arise in a way that conforms to your ability to perceive them. Get that?
Let me paraphrase it and put it in another way, because it's delightful once you savor this proposition to play with it and paraphrase it, put it in your own words, paraphrase it in different ways. Like this, the dynamic forces that produce the myriad worlds of the universe in all of their processes, in all of their features, and all of their creatures, does so in a way that is conformable with your ability to perceive what it does.
The designing power that causes the universe to manifest produces that manifestation in a way that conforms to your ability to perceive it and comprehend it. That's the proposition. I call that the principle of semblance.
Semblance: That is to say that when you look, for instance, at the natural world out here, if you ever have occasion to do that, by the way, and you look at trees, clouds, skies, rivers, mountains. You look at butterflies and dragonflies and serpents and elephants roaming the plains and you look at human beings. You look at everything that the natural world produces, including the human species. The force that produces all that, the designing power, produces it in a way that is semblant to your faculties of perceiving it.
Semblant: So your faculties of perceiving the world match the forces that construct the world in the first place. Well, I don't know how that comes across to you. Whether it seems recondite, obscure, very esoteric, a lot of blah blah blah, a lot of empty verbiage, or it may dawn on your mind as something paramountly wonderful to know. And if it does dawn on your mind in that way, as it dawned on my mind, in my mind, a good fifty years ago, then you will know that it does because that proposition plants a kind of seed in you and it incites and encourages the disposition to learn how such a wonderful thing could actually be so.
It's an extremely simple proposition and you will note, I think, if you reflect on it, and it doesn't take much reflection to see this, that proposition absolutely contradicts the primary assumptions of modern science coming forward from, say, the end of the 19th century. The assumption of science as it is today, which is a hoax and a fraud and a true terrible shameful deceit perpetrated upon humanity is that what makes the universe work and what makes things appear in the universe is irrepresentable to the human mind and inaccessible to the human senses.
For instance, what they're doing at CERN is irrepresentable to your mind. They are operating in particle physics dynamics, which your mind cannot even represent to itself a picture or concept of what they're doing. And additionally, and this is really the killing blow of the fraud of modern science. You cannot with your sensorial organs reach that realm where the events that manifest as the universe are happening.
But the principle of semblance from Hindu Tantra, Vidya, Hindu cosmology completely blows that presumption out of the water and if you get that principle and I dearly hope you do then you're on. You are in the game of divine manifestation. It's a wonderful thing to remind yourself if you can every day, that the designing powers that produce the natural world you behold also produced designed evolved to develop and implemented the senses by which you behold it, the senses by which you behold it are configured into what you behold. It is one single integral miracle of divine manifestation and you're in it as an integral circuit.
The Mandela effect is going to go very, very far on this planet. I assure you of that. What you're seeing now, what you're getting now through this effect, it's just the tip of the arrow. What's coming behind this effect is something momentous. So you want to get in on it at the get-go. You want to get in on the divine manifestation operating through the Mandela effect and participate at the elementary level. And it does begin there. It does introduce itself to you at the elementary level, as I've explained.
It starts out by using phonemes, which resemble the language of baby talk. And the reason why the source of the Mandela Effect uses phonemes and also homophones, as I'll explain soon, is that those sound units have an electro-acoustical ability to tap into your brain. Those phonemes are like the electrodes that are attached to the body and the head of a person who is undergoing some kind of test, such as a lie detector test, or someone who is hooked up to a biofeedback machine.
Everyone knows what those electrodes look like. They're little wires and they have at the end of them a tab with an adhesive, an adhesive tab, so that they stick to your temple or some other sensitive part of your body. Those phonemes that are catching your attention in the Mandela effect are like electrodes that the source of the effect is attaching to you so that she can wire you up for her correction.
Okay, I don't know, I just, that's a little riff and it's already nine minutes into this talk. But I couldn't resist saying that to you today because I enjoy so much what's happening here. And I enjoy and respect so much the way that you are getting on to my investigation, our investigation, as indicated by your remarks in the comments section. Tak.
Now what I want to accomplish in this in this upload in this talk is to look at one of the three fronts where the Mandela effect is breaking into the human mind into the field of consciousness of the human animal. I define these three fronts in this way.
There is the intra-psychic front, in other words, the effect is breaking into your psyche. It breaks into what I call the endo-psyche, E-N-D-O. That's my Gnostic term. That's Gnostic jargon. It refers to what has been called the subconscious and the unconscious, although there's really no such thing as the unconscious, there's just denial of consciousness.
So, the intra-psychic effect, the intra-psychic front, where the Mandela effect is breaking into human reality, is obvious, because that's where your memory is affected. Memory is a faculty of the endo-psyche. In Gnostic, or shamanic jargon, in the tradecraft of planetary tantra, we say that the endo-psyche, or the subconscious of the human animal is the second attention.
Carlos Castaneda originally introduced the paradigm of the three attentions. You will find that I have extrapolated and elaborated that paradigm extensively beyond anything Castaneda said, and I'll have more to say about the three attentions as this investigation proceeds, and particularly about the stake of the second attention. Put that in quotes, “the stake of the second attention”, stake being S-T-A-K-E.
So, that's the one front, obviously, and everybody gets that. The other front is this really baffling phenomenon of material change. I mean, get it! Get it! If you don't get it, how can you be so dense? I'm talking about car ornaments. I’m talking about engine blocks. I’m talking about 40, 50, 100 year old volumes of the Bible, printed a hundred years ago, volumes of biblical glossaries and what are they called, concordances, and interlinear versions of the Hebrew and Greek texts. This is material scripture changed, talking about material change, and as you may note in talk 20, I explained that this material change in the metallic ornaments of cars as well as in the written printed pages of the Bible has a simple explanation. It's by a limit, by a process of elimination. Looking at the natural world, use your noodle, use your common sense.
Look at the maple tree, and look at the way the leaves of the maple tree change, how they bud in their light green color in the spring, and then they change and they get a darker color and then they change in the fall into the magnificent colors of the maples that I used to observe in my native state of Maine. People would come to Maine in October to see the colors of autumn, the alchemy of color of autumn. What produces the alchemy of the color of autumn? What produces the phenomenon of the sakura, the plum blossom in Japan, which brings millions of Japanese out into nature and into the parks to ogle these plum blossoms, the sakura.
What creates, what material force creates that? Well, whatever it is, and whatever name you want to put on it, I contend that the same material force is the only conceivable source of the material changes you see in the Ford medallion, the Ford car ornament, the VW car ornament, the Volvo car ornament, and so forth. And I challenge anybody to come forth and, with a better explanation, or to come forth and refute my explanation as I presented in talk 20. Okay, fine.
Now we come to the third front, and this is where things get a little dubious. Let's admit it folks, the detection of the Mandela effect has largely occurred on the internet. And the vast amount, the preponderant amount of evidence for the effect is found, or detected, and exchanged and exposed and discussed on the internet, that is to say in the virtual world.
The first front is the psyche itself, memory, the endo-psyche. Memory is a specific function in the endo-psyche. The second front is material changes in the world, provable material changes. Those are inarguable, well the first is very subjective of course, the second is very objective. When you come to the third front, which is Mandela effects manifesting in the virtual, in IT, well that's obviously rather dubious.
Now, as you well know, there are a fair number of observers of this phenomenon who dismiss it entirely as a psyop, as if it were only happening in virtual reality on the Internet. Well, it isn't only happening there, but let's give some attention to that particular front for a moment. I've titled this installment of the investigation, number 28, whatever it is, you notice that I have a slight handicap with linearity.
I've entitled it “Mother Hack, Divine Mischief on the Internet”. Okay, so Mother Hack is more Gnostic jargon. It's a slang term among my little shamanic team for the Mandela effect. The Mandela effect is the mother hack. The mother, the Aeonic mother, the divine Sophia, who is the indwelling supernatural presence of the earth, has hacked into the human psyche. And, and, and this is so hilarious really, she's also hacked into the Internet.
Now bear in mind that the Internet is just a product of human intelligence. Human animals created the Internet and they maintain it every day. The Internet could not be there if human creatures did not have the superior intelligence to conceive, design, and construct it in the first place. So the cyber zone is a medium that must be attributed entirely to human invention and to human ingenuity and collaboration and so forth and so on.
Nevertheless, as you all know, the cyber zone, the realm of IT or informational technology tends to take on a character of its own, doesn't it? It seems as if it's a world of its own. It seems as if it exists apart from the human intelligence that created it. Of course it doesn't, and it can't last without continual support and management by human intelligence, but in and of itself it stands as a quasi-independent medium. And what I have claimed, what I'm claiming now, as you hear me speak, is that the planetary logos, the intelligence of the entire Earth itself, has in some manner concentrated its attention upon what's on the Internet and is actually hacked into the Internet.
So I'm claiming that these anomalies and these instances of the Mandela Effect, which appear in thousands and thousands of cases on the Internet, are not due to human manipulation. No, not at all. Let it be clear in your minds that I completely reject the notion that anything being done at CERN can produce these effects.
Let me ask you this, how about CERN proving that it can produce the Mandela effect in this way. Select a square mile of the Maine woods, near where I lived in Friendship, Maine. That would be a forest area composed mainly of deciduous trees, is that the correct term? Trees that shed their leaves and change the color of their leaves over time. If the activities at CERN and the power of the Hadron Super Collider and so forth and so on can produce the Mandela effect, I would like to see them, those wizards over there at CERN, cause that square mile of forest to take on its autumnal colors of orange, gold, yellow, amber, raspberry.
I would like to see them cause the trees in that one chosen one square mile of woods to go through the changes that they go through in autumn and then reverse those changes and bring them back to the green of spring. I would like to see them do that. And if the CERN machine, the CERN magic machine, can't do that, then how could it produce anything like the Mandela effect?
Now, without going off on a riff about CERN, that'll come up sooner or later, I want to concentrate again on the title of this talk, “Divine Mischief on the Internet”. First of all, let's look at this term, divine. I realize that merely by using this term I would discredit myself in the minds of many people. Atheists, materialists, scientific materialists, completely reject the idea that there is anything divine in the universe. They don't know how I use that word.
I use that word in a common sense way, and I also use that word, divine, in a way that has behind it a deep foundation in actual natural science. So the word divine comes from a Proto-Indo-European root, that's abbreviated P-I-E, which is dev, D-E-V, which means radiant.
So, all scholars agree that the Indo-European root of divine is the word radiant, and therefore divine simply means radiant. But what does radiant mean? Well, I would propose to you a better term than radiant. That means the same thing, but actually is more expressive and can be verified or correlated to natural sciences that make sense. Hey, that's an idea. Damn, that's catchy. When was the last time you ever heard of any science that makes sense?
That makes sense of the natural world and can actually produce results in the natural world. Well, there was a breakthrough out of the fraud and delusion of 20th century science in the 1970s. It's remarkable that this breakthrough happened pretty much at the same time. Here I go again, that the Nag Hammadi writings were first published in English, around 1976 and coincidentally at the same time that Lynn Margulis and James Lovelock stated the Gaia Hypothesis. What am I talking about?
Well, I'm talking about a new branch of science which is entirely distinct from particle physics, quantum theory, string theory, and so forth and so on. That emerged in the 1970s, and when it initially emerged it was called Stochastic Theory. S-T-O-C-H-A-S-T-I-C. You can go and search that term. So it was called for short Stochastics.
And as that's not a particularly user-friendly term, it came to be called Chaos Theory, and it was very closely related to the emergent science and the emergent investigation of fractals and the Mandelbrot set, which was discovered in 1980. So in the mid to late 1970s, you find that there is a breakthrough in the form of a new kind of science, which came to be called chaos theory and then complexity theory.
And if you go and investigate complexity theory today, you will find that one of the principal concepts of complexity theory, one of the central ideas of the theory, one of the building blocks, is emergence. And so, in that genre of science, they speak of emergent processes. And this is a legitimate term, and this is a whole new field of science that is evolving, and it is much more... this field of science is much closer to the proposition that I stated at the beginning of this talk than anything that you will see in the abstract insanity and delusional bullshit of Relativity Theory, quantum mechanics, string theory.
These are delusional games that the human mind is playing with itself that take us entirely away from the natural world, but complexity theory returns the investigation to the natural world. So I would propose to you that the best definition, the better definition, of the word divine is emergent. That which is emergent is divine. That which is divine is emergent.
So when I say divine mischief on the internet, what I'm referring to is that some supernatural force, that is to say, some force operating in the foundation of the natural world, is breaking through into the medium that human animals have created which is called the internet? Now why is it breaking through into the internet? Why would the planetary logos want to hack the internet?
Well, isn't it obvious that the attention of the great majority of people on the planet is located in the internet. That's where our attention as a species is now located. In many cases, it is located there far more than it is located in the natural world and to the exclusion of the natural world.
So, what is the situation facing the planetary animal mother, the Aeon Sophia, when she wants to reach the human subject in the divine experiment for the purposes of her correction. Well, what's the situation facing her? She has to go to get your attention where your attention happens to be located. Take the example of a mother who has, say, a one-year-old child, and at some point this child got its hands on a tablet, and it became fascinated with the tablet and playing with the touch screen, and actually, because it became obsessed with using the tablet, this one-year-old child eventually is able to interact with the tablet, is able to call up certain programs, is able to manipulate the medium, to manipulate the applications that are available in the realm of IT.
Now imagine that the situation is so grave that this child of the mere age of one no longer pays any attention to its mother because it's entirely focused on the tablet. It's entirely absorbed in the cyber zone. Well, its mother, its natural human mother, wants to reach it, but it can't reach it because its attention has been subsumed by another medium. Okay? So what does the mother do? Well she’s clever. She goes on the internet and contacts her child in that way.
So let me summarize here, coming around the bend to the conclusion of this talk, once again running over 30 minutes. The divine or emergent power that's operating in the natural world is intelligent. It has sovereign intelligence, the earth goddess Sophia has a sovereign intelligence which is there for you to recognize and discover. I don't make that statement as a doctrinal claim or as a conjecture or as a statement of wishful thinking. I make it as a statement of my experience having lived for 50 years in the exploration of the principle of semblance.
So she, the earth mother, has a sovereign intelligence and she's using it to hack into the internet. And what does she do on the internet? Well, she makes mischief. She makes mischief. She plays around with you on the internet. She's playing with you. Don't you get the sense that there is a playful or ludic element in the Mandela effect?
I for one would venture to say that if you can't sense the mischievous and playful factor in in the Mandela effect that you're not really getting it. The point that I would like to make as a takeaway of this talk is a really important one, and I would say that it touches on something that's really decisive to this investigation.
In the Mythophrenia material, which I have cited as background to my YouTube adventure here, there are three talks, and I think they're text and talk in all three cases, on divine intervention. And I make the point in those talks that although divine intervention is one of the top five myth themes or mythological motifs of the human species there is a version or scenario of divine intervention which has never been adequately considered. It's never been given a fair chance.
So if you would go and spend six months or six years of your life, which you could do, which I've certainly done, I've spent three times six years of my life, investigating the religious and mythological evidence for the belief in divine intervention. And if you to not only go to the source materials, such as for instance the writings of the Hebrew prophets Daniel, Isaiah and so forth, or if you were to go of course to the book of Revelation, or if you were to go into Islam or to Hindu religion or to any number of other genres and cultures where the notion of divine intervention has been entertained, and then upon accessing the source materials, if you were to go to the secondary and tertiary materials which assist you in evaluating those source materials, well, that would be one hell of an exercise of your time and attention, wouldn't it?
But I can tell you something right now, right here, as someone who's had the privilege in his life to make that investigation, that there is one unique variant of this theme totally lacking from every preconceived notion of divine intervention that has ever been considered. There is one really novel concept of divine intervention. And what is that? Well, it's the concept that it is done in a mischievous and playful manner. That divine intervention is not an apocalyptic horror show like you see in the book of Revelation, that it is not a supreme act of judgment and cruel punishment or reward executed by an off- planet creator God upon the human species living pitifully in a petri dish?
No, it's fun. It's an act of joy and delight and mischief. Consider that possibility. That is the pure novelty of Sophia's correction. That is an element, probably the outstanding element, in the shock of this breakthrough. It's hilarious and why not? Who says it couldn't be? Who says it couldn't be so? I assure you that if you do not register the novelty of Sophia's correction in this respect, that the Mandela effect is a playful and mischievous event, then you're not getting it at all, and you can't go along for the ride.
That recognition is one factor, one requirement of participation in her correction, and there are requirements, there are definite requirements. It's not for everyone. You select yourself into Sophia's correction by the way that you recognize and acknowledge it. It is not a collective awakening. This is not a collective awakening. It is a selective awakening.
So there you go, I've almost got up to 40 minutes. I guess that's just the way it happens on certain days, and I actually don't mind that, but I do prefer to keep it down to under 30 when I can. Anyway, so it goes, and so it flows, and so the investigation proceeds, and until the next time, may your attention be rewarded by the truth.