WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning: Toroidal Truman-atrix

23 days ago · 1 like · New Earth Entertainment, Dennis (redpilloftruth.com), and Dennis promoting Mark Passio

***Oh yeah, and WATCH THE DAMN MATRIX MOVIE, will ya, Sheena???!!!

Note: follow-up interview with Sheena, in which she finally watched The Matrix!

Above video on New Earth Entertainment

I think the entry video speaks for itself. I have sooooo many posts on my substack to assist Sheena to understand more about our illusory matrix reality. I’ll try to pick just my top 10 posts for this, to keep the list as short as possible:

#One

#Two

#Three

#Four

#Five

#Six

#Seven

#Eight

#Nine

#Ten

P.S. Bonus post dealing with illusory existence and the divine feminine, and besides, it’s a really catchy song!!!

P.P.S. Final bonus post, as it’s a really catchy song too, and deals with illusory “America (…the failed experiment…)”, versus true “America (…true heart attitude…)” … TRUE AMERICA WILL TRULY ALWAYS STAND WITH TRUTH!!!

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Start writing today. Use the button below to create a Substack of your own

cthelight of Divine Feminine and Divine Masculine

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Sat, 22 Aug 2026 03:22:40 GMT

Entry video on youtube

I’ve been following this cthelight guy for a while. He claims to talk to the Gnostic divine feminine figures and calls them all by various names: Sophia, Lumen, Lumara, Barbelo, a mix of Gnostic terms and his own imagination, I think.

Note: to download an mp3 only of the song:

He also believes in reality as a projected illusion (…so I put this in the truman-atrix section, though it also sort of belongs in general Gnosticism too), and he has been documenting his attempts (...for years...) to crack the code of so-called reality and change the outside world. His video also references divine masculine images, such as Christ, but mostly focuses on lots of sexy images of the divine feminine, which I think is healthy ……

He seems to understand that in esoteric thought any wo/man is considered female, despite outward literal gender. See his short video below:

Now as to the implications of divine feminine and masculine ideas …

Who says eternal Truth levels of reality have to be sexless and boring?

Even Mark Passio talks about the divine feminine, masculine, and the child born of this union. To jump to where Mark talks about this divine Trinity of feminine, masculine, and child born of this union, click HERE.

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Start writing today. Use the button below to create a Substack of your own

Full Icke video on youtube

The parable of, "Picard forgets the truman-atrix"

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Sat, 13 Dec 2025 00:55:47 GMT

What things are only impossible until they are not? I’d say walking ALWAYS within spiritual awareness (connected to your Higher Self) is impossible……until it’s not.

In the entry clip, Picard forgot that he was Captain Picard and lived an entirely different life inside a fake simulated world. An alien probe made Picard believe that he somehow got transported to another world and everybody thought that Picard was actually Kamin, a longstanding member of the community. He even had a wife.

Picard resisted at first, tried to contact the Enterprise to get free of his “cage”. Eventually, he adjusted to his new reality, and accepted that he was stranded on his new home. He settled down with his wife, forgot that he had been Picard, had children, grandchildren even, grew old, and as death approached, the full truth was revealed to him.

None of it had been real. It was all illusion. His wife had previously died, but she returned to him in his old age, she now young again, as well as his dead friend, Batai, suddenly appeared.

This episode is a parable of our human life.

I’ve heard many accounts of young children, who, until about the age of 7, remember their past lives. Then, like Picard in the episode, s/he gives up his/her old life and fully embraces a new life path, marrying in later years, having children, grandchildren even, growing old, etc, etc… similar to this informative Star Trek episode. We are meant to eventually learn the full truth, like Picard did, but sadly, these days most never do.

David Icke talks about this past life phenomenon in the clip below. There is evidence for these ideas. I don’t cast it all aside as sci-fi.

Similar to Picard in this episode, sooner or later, we are meant to realize that reality is NOT what it appears to be, an illusion for some purpose, everything around us is fake, truman-atrix style even, single-player mode; that’s what Picard got. Truman-atrix-plus could be likened to a multi-player game, which I suspect our so-called reality is a bit of both, at times.

Picard retained some new skills & learning from the fake world, such as the flute clip below demonstrates.

But could Picard have done better?

If Picard symbolically represents our “Higher Spiritual Being/Existence” and Kamin represents our “lower physical being/existence”, could Kamin have accepted that he wasn’t real, wasn’t even alive really, just a fake avatar body in a fake illusory world? In other words, could Kamin have lived the life of Kamin, fully embracing his acting role, while never forgetting that he was really Picard? It’s only impossible until it’s not.

I submit that flesh & blood humans (Kamins) were always meant to re-connect with their higher spiritual selves (Picards). We were meant to fully understand that we are Picards, only acting as Kamins.

As the next King Arthur entry clip demonstrates, maintaining connection requires to fight and never surrender! Camelot lives!

The entry video continues with Rudolph Steiner’s revelations about Ahriman versus Lucifer, each extreme leading to either spiritual amnesia OR spiritual escapism. Steiner recommended consciousness strength training, sort of like a combination of examined “beliefs-gnosis-personal experience-creative expression”, to strengthen an individual against invisible forces.

For example, truly think instead of thinking about thinking, or thinking what you have been programmed to think. Live fully in physical reality, fully conscious, in the present moment, while remaining awake to spiritual dimensions interpenetrating physicality. This is what it means to live consciously in matter, while not being of matter.

The other Steiner video from the entry series discusses hidden history, which is akin to our own personal hidden history. Do you remember every moment of your current physical life? Of course not; nobody does. If we can’t remember our own personal history, how credible is the scant history books we have?

Go within your heart. Know that “Gnosti-Matrix-ism” is as much a credible history and/or future, as anything else that you sense is true about the present moment. There is much truth in fiction, whether “The Matrix” movies OR Gnostic sci-fi!

Click for more about Gnosti-Matrix-ism

Below, Jean Nolan on Who we truly ARE (Picards) beyond ego identities (Kamins).

What on earth is happening (WOEIH) - transcriptions 4 study

Below, another Steiner video, regarding insights as to WHY many people have difficulty understanding this article and/or engendering interest.

Finally, I’ll end this post with some good advice re: breaking free from the matrix by re-making the matrix.

Summary of above video:

Achieve gnosis and break ego consciousness and allow the unconscious to speak
Name and transcend the Archons by making your complexes conscious

Escaping the matrix, Blavatsky style

a year ago · 4 likes · 6 comments · Dennis promoting Mark Passio

Integrate the opposites through the union of internal masculine & feminine, conscious & unconscious, light & shadow
Recognize yourself as the divine spark, the Self, not the ego
Help others awaken, not by preaching or converting but by embodying liberation

I sense the higher connection(s) at times, but it is impossible to maintain that connection always, in the modern world, for a variety of reasons. Or, am I wrong about that?

Is it only impossible until it’s not?

I invite my readers to drop some comments about whether or not this constant connection is possible.

Neuroscience video below video showing that the ego-energy component of the human psyche is indeed dead, very programmable, not really alive, unless the divine spark within “programs” (…or more accurately, re-programs it…) it; even then, it will always be a “garment” of sorts, worn by the Higher Spirit Self.

Brief clip below from Trina Dawn, “no-mind” teacher, about how the body-mind is being trained. I’d say trained to be a good “ego-energy-suit”, to be put on like a garment, used in various conscious ways, in the next “life”.

Full video on youtube

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Start writing today. Use the button below to create a Substack of your own

The parable of, "C The Light decently explains the truman-atrix"

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Tue, 09 Dec 2025 21:45:53 GMT

Entry video on youtube

In the entry video, cthelight does a decent job waffling through describing the various aspects of our truman-atrix reality: subjective versus objective realities, individual versus collective, etc…

I thought it was a good one to archive on my substack, not much commentary needed by me.

But, for even better explanations, check out videos below:

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Start writing today. Use the button below to create a Substack of your own

Toroidal Truman-atrix

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Tue, 19 Aug 2025 22:03:10 GMT

Entry video on youtube

The entry video explains WHY I am changing the name of this section to the “Toroidal Truman-atrix”

Nuf said.

P.S. One new thing I just thought about. Jason “archaix” Breshears talks about the “revelation of the method” and how it might be evidence that the “elite” are NOT all evil, but rather, the revelations are meant to help us change things.

Is archaix’s deep research about the Phoenix cataclysm, due in the year 2040, an unstoppable future event? He always insists so. Is Jason revealing a method to us that, once seen, can be changed?

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Start writing today. Use the button below to create a Substack of your own

The parable of, "The matrix will be switched off soon"

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Mon, 17 Mar 2025 23:50:54 GMT

In this Howdie Mickoski interview, he talks about his intuitive understanding that the matrix will be switched off at some point soon, nobody knows exactly when. Below video is Howdie’s personal introduction story that he mentioned in the interview.

This “shutting the matrix off” idea is more of a concept, rather than perceived literally, because, from the human point of view, it is unlikely that people will notice/remember anything unusual. Literality is what the 5 senses detect, but reality is what the 7 spiritual senses detect beyond the 5 literal senses.

Anyway, Howdie talks about how some people may only get a chance to understand this concept after physical death, and can possibly make the transition then. What that will look like exactly, nobody knows, but I intuitively hear truth in what Howdie says, and in fact, I'd say I'm already "after physical death and seeing what that looks like for me". Again, I speak metaphorically and not sure my readers will get what I mean.

Howdie makes the point that ANYTHING a person does at this point, such as:

changing the financial system
bringing in Bitcoin freedom money
exposing & changing the corrupt legal system
can only waste your true energy (which is time and attention). At this point, except for defining & comprehending the little self (ie ego) versus the Higher Self/Selves (ie what I call the Co-Creator-Oversoul [COCO] collective consciousness), anything else is just ultimately digging a person deeper into the matrix. Once this “defin-hending” work is fully embodied, moving about while remaining in stillness is a fine way to occupy time until the singularity.

My readers can take my opinion as s/he wills, of course, but I agree that the things one thinks & feels & does MUST serve your self/Self definitions in some way, OR you are destined for another matrix merry-go-round.

None of these concepts apply to what I call Originator-Creator-Oversoul (OCO), by the way.

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Start writing today. Use the button below to create a Substack of your own

Danique talking about the truman-atrix

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Sun, 09 Mar 2025 04:53:14 GMT

Smart young lady that I conjured up to explain the truman-atrix. No commentary needed by me.

Gnostic scholar talks about the FGS means the Fallen Goddess Scenario. I think that it could also stand for the Fun, Game, and Seriousness scenario (as in don’t take life too seriously).

The Simulation Hypothesis

Below, are some good books from computer expert Rizwan Virk about the video game analogies.

The Simulated Multiverse

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Start writing today. Use the button below to create a Substack of your own

The parable of, "Using mindpowers to change reality going forward from today's year 2025"

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Fri, 03 Jan 2025 08:15:13 GMT

Aether Pirates of the Matterium!

“When we ascribe reality to what we see, then we can say this observer who was brought into existence by the universe has, by his acts of observation, a part in bringing that universe itself into” …

Harmony

Harmony…

2 years ago · 316 likes · 120 comments · clif high

What if everything you thought you knew about life and death was completely wrong? What if, instead of living in a solid, objective reality, you were part of a cosmic illusion, one shaped not by the world around you, but by your own consciousness? The renowned physicist John Wheeler posed a radical idea that upends everything.

The universe doesn't simply exist on its own. It requires you to observe it. Without you, there's no shape, no structure, no past. Wheeler called this the participatory-anthropic principle, suggesting that reality itself depends on your participation to exist. This isn't science fiction. It's a theory rooted in cutting-edge physics and age-old philosophical questions.

But if reality is created by your observation, then what happens when you stop observing? What happens when you die? Could we already be part of something far larger and far stranger than life and death as we know it? If reality itself depends on you, what happens when you stop participating?

Have you ever stopped to wonder if the universe is as solid as it seems? We're taught to believe in a world that exists independently of us, a universe of stars and atoms, fixed and unchanging. But John Wheeler's participatory anthropic principle challenges that belief. He suggested something so radical that it shook the foundations of physics.

The universe doesn't just exist. It relies on you to exist. Imagine this. Every tree, every mountain, every particle of dust doesn't fully become real until it's observed. This isn't just philosophical speculation. It's an idea rooted in quantum mechanics. In the quantum world, particles exist in a state of probabilities, a blur of potential outcomes. But when observed, these probabilities collapse into a single definitive state.

Wheeler's insight was this. What happens at the smallest levels of reality doesn't stay confined there. The same principle governs the universe itself. This means that our role isn't passive. Reality isn't a pre-written book we're reading. It's a story that only unfolds as we participate.

Wheeler famously said, “We are participants in bringing the universe into being”.

Think about that. The stars, the galaxies, the very fabric of space and time. They depend on our observations to exist in their current form. Without consciousness, the universe would be an unmanifested sea of possibilities waiting for someone to look. This leads to a profound question.

If reality emerges through observation, then who or what observed it in the first place? Wheeler had an answer. Time and causality themselves may be illusions. In his view, the act of observing not only shapes the present, but retroactively determines the past. That's right. Our observations today could influence events that we think have already happened.

Wheeler encapsulated this with his phrase: “it from bit”.

He argued that everything physical, every atom, every galaxy, arises from immaterial information. The bit is the fundamental building block of reality, the smallest unit of information. From this perspective, the universe isn't made of matter. It's made of meaning. Shaped by the questions we ask and the answers we uncover.

Reality, as Wheeler saw it, is participatory from the ground up. If this sounds abstract, let's bring it closer to home. Think of how your perception shapes your experience. Two people can look at the same sunset and see completely different things. One sees a vibrant palette of colors, while the other feels a deep sense of peace.

The sunset doesn't exist as one fixed thing. Its reality changes based on who's observing it. Wheeler suggested that this isn't just a metaphor. It's the very nature of reality itself. The implications are staggering. If reality is participatory, then what about the concept of death? Does life end when we stop observing? Or does the process of observation continue in some form we don't yet understand?

These questions aren't just philosophical, they're deeply personal. They make us rethink everything we assume about existence and our place in the cosmos. And this is where ancient wisdom can help us make sense of these modern ideas.

Mystical traditions from around the world have long echoed Wheeler's insights. Hermetic philosophy, for example, teaches that the universe is mental in nature, a concept strikingly similar to it from bit. In both views, reality isn't external, but emerges from consciousness itself. It's no coincidence that these ideas resonate with the hermetic principles laid out in the Kybalion.

The principle of mentalism states that the all is mind, suggesting that everything we perceive is a projection of a universal consciousness. If Wheeler's work resonates with you, then you'll find profound connections in these ancient teachings. That's why we're offering a free e-book of the Kybalion to explore these transformative ideas further.

Some things simply can't be fully explained here, which is why I started sharing resources through my newsletter. Click the link in the description, enter your email, and dive into the hermetic principles that shaped how reality is understood. So what does this mean for you?

Wheeler's participatory universe isn't just a scientific curiosity. It's an invitation to take a more active role in shaping the world around you. Every thought, every decision, every observation matters. You're not just a spectator in the grand theater of existence, you're a co-creator. But let's take this one step further.

If our observations shape reality, could it be that the evidence for this participatory nature is embedded in the fabric of the universe itself? What if the proof is all around us, hidden in the everyday moments we take for granted? Could we already be participating in ways we don't fully realize?

Time

It's the one constant we all rely on. The unyielding force that seems to march forward, pulling us through life. We live by it, measure it, and feel its weight in every passing moment. But what if time, as we understand it, isn't real? What if it's just another illusion created by our consciousness, an artifact of the way we perceive reality?

John Wheeler's participatory anthropic principle suggests that time is not a pre-existing river flowing independently of us. Instead, it's a construct that emerges through observation. The idea sounds radical, but it aligns with what we've learned from quantum mechanics. The act of observing doesn't just shape the present, it can influence the past.

This concept is known as retro-causality, and it turns our understanding of time on its head. Imagine this. You're watching a movie, frame by frame. To you, the sequence of events seems fixed and linear. But what if you could interact with the film, changing the outcome of earlier frames based on choices you make later? This, in essence, is what Wheeler proposed.

He believed that our participation in reality doesn't just affect what lies ahead. It reaches backward, shaping the very foundation of existence. This isn't just abstract theory. Experiments in quantum mechanics, such as Wheeler's own Delayed Choice experiment, have demonstrated this principle.

In the experiment, a particle's behavior is determined by the act of observation even if the observation occurs after the particle's journey has begun. In other words, the particle's past isn't fixed until it's observed in the present. If this happens on the smallest scale, what does it mean for the larger world we inhabit?

If time isn't fixed, then what about our lives? We think of birth, life, and death as a linear journey. But Wheeler's insights suggest that life itself may be less about a beginning and an end, and more about an eternal loop of observation and participation. Could it be that we're already part of a timeless process, one where life and death are merely shifts in perception? This perspective isn't new.

Ancient traditions have long taught that time is an illusion. In Hermetic philosophy, for instance, time is seen as a construct of the mind, a tool for navigating the physical world, but not an ultimate reality. Eastern philosophies echo this sentiment.

The Bhagavad Gita, a cornerstone of Hindu thought, speaks of the eternal self that exists beyond birth and death, untouched by time. If Wheeler's theory resonates with these ancient teachings, it raises profound questions about the nature of existence. Are we truly alive in the way we think of life, or are we already part of something far greater, a timeless and infinite consciousness? And if death is simply a transition, what does it mean to die in a participatory universe? Consider this.

If our observations create reality, then the act of dying might not be an end, but a shift in the way we participate. Mystics and spiritual traditions have hinted at this for centuries. They describe death not as a cessation but as a doorway, a transformation into a different state of being.

Wheeler's insights suggest that this isn't just metaphorical, it's woven into the fabric of reality itself. Think of dreams. When you're dreaming, the passage of time feels real. You experience events, emotions, and even a sense of continuity. But when you wake up, you realize that the time in your dream wasn't time at all. It was a construct of your mind, a framework for the experiences you were creating.

What if waking life is similar? What if our experience of time is simply a tool that allows us to participate in the unfolding of reality?

If time is an illusion, it opens up possibilities we've never considered. Could our choices today ripple backward, affecting not only our future but our past? Could we, through focused intention and observation, rewrite the story of our lives in ways we've yet to understand? This isn't just speculation.

It's a call to rethink the way we live, the way we perceive, and the way we shape the world around us. This brings us to an important realization. If time is participatory, then so is existence itself. We are not separate from the universe. We are active participants in its creation.

The universe isn't a machine ticking along without us. It's a living, dynamic process that depends on our consciousness. Our thoughts, our choices, our very awareness are the threads that weave the fabric of reality. But this raises another question.

If time and existence are participatory, then what role does death play in this grand design? Is death the ultimate end, or is it simply a transformation, a shift in the way we interact with the universe? Could it be that dying is less about ceasing to exist and more about moving into a different mode of participation?

This isn't just philosophical speculation. It's a perspective that invites us to live differently, to see our lives not as a linear journey, but as part of an infinite and interconnected whole. It challenges us to embrace the present moment, not as a fleeting point on a timeline, but as the place where reality is created.

Wheeler's insights ask us to rethink everything. If time is an illusion, then the way we measure our lives by years, achievements, and milestones might be missing the point. What matters isn't how much time we have, but how we use our consciousness to shape the world around us. Every thought, every observation, every moment is an act of creation. And if that's true, then life and death might be far more intertwined than we ever imagined.

Could it be that we've misunderstood the very nature of existence? If time is a tool for participation, then death might simply be a transition into another phase of that participation. And if that's the case, what does it mean to truly live?

If Wheeler's idea is correct, that reality itself is participatory, then the evidence for this must be all around us. But what does this evidence look like? How can we find proof that our observations shape reality? The answer lies not just in complex theories or mystical philosophies, but in everyday experiences and phenomena that challenge the very notion of an independent, objective universe.

Let's start with quantum mechanics, the foundation of Wheeler's participatory anthropic principle. One of the most famous experiments in physics, the double slit experiment, provides startling insights into the role of observation in shaping reality.

In this experiment, particles of light or photons are shot through two slits toward a screen. When unobserved, the particles behave like waves, creating an interference pattern on the screen. But when a measuring device is introduced to observe which slit the particles pass through, they behave like particles, and the interference pattern disappears.

This means that the act of observation fundamentally changes how reality manifests. Without an observer, particles exist in a state of potential, as waves of probabilities. It's as if reality itself waits to see what we're looking for before it decides what to become.

Wheeler extended this principle, suggesting that the entire universe behaves this way. Not just particles, but the very fabric of space and time depends on our participation. This may sound abstract, but consider how this principle manifests in your daily life.

Have you ever noticed how your perception of something changes the moment you focus on it? A conversation that seemed innocuous suddenly becomes meaningful when you actively listen. A garden you pass by every day becomes beautiful when you stop and truly observe its colors and textures.

These moments aren't just about attention, they're about creation. The world you see isn't fixed. It responds to how you observe it.

Wheeler believed that this participatory nature extends beyond the present moment. In his Delayed Choice experiment, he demonstrated that our observations in the present can influence how events unfolded in the past. Think about that for a moment. The past isn't set in stone. It's fluid, shaped by our conscious interaction with reality.

This challenges the common understanding of time as linear and unchangeable, suggesting instead that it is dynamic and intertwined with our awareness. The implications of this are profound. If the universe is participatory, then our role isn't just to witness, it's to co-create. Every thought, every decision, every observation contributes to the unfolding of reality.

This isn't just a philosophical idea, it's a responsibility. The way we observe the world has the power to shape not just our personal experiences, but the collective reality we share. But the evidence doesn't stop with quantum mechanics. Look at nature.

In biology, there's a concept called biocentrism, which suggests that life and consciousness are fundamental to the universe. Plants, for example, respond to the presence of observers. Studies have shown that plants can react to human attention, growing faster or changing their behavior based on how they are treated.

While this might sound mystical, it aligns with the idea that reality is shaped by participation. Even in human perception, the participatory nature of reality is evident. The way we see colors, hear sounds, or interpret events isn't fixed. It depends on our consciousness. Two people can experience the same moment and perceive it entirely differently, shaping their individual realities.

This doesn't mean reality is subjective in the sense of being imaginary. Rather, it means that consciousness plays an active role in defining what is real. If we accept that our observations shape reality, what does this mean for death? In a participatory universe, death may not be the end of existence, but a transformation in the way we interact with reality.

Just as a particle's behavior changes when observed, our consciousness might shift into a new mode of participation when we stop observing in this physical world. Could it be that death is not a cessation, but a transition, a continuation of the participatory process in a different form?

This perspective aligns with many ancient teachings. Hermetic philosophy, for instance, suggests that the universe is mental in nature, governed by principles that reflect our own consciousness. The Hermetic axiom, as above, so below, hints at the interconnectedness between the macrocosm of the universe and the microcosm of the human mind.

If the universe is participatory, then it operates on the same principles as our consciousness, shaped by thought, intention, and observation. Consider how this changes the way we approach life. If reality depends on participation, then every moment becomes an opportunity to create.

The world isn't something that happens to us, it's something we help bring into being. This isn't just a passive observation, it's an active, ongoing process. And if our observations shape reality, then our collective participation could have far-reaching effects.

For example, when groups of people focus their attention on a shared intention, such as peace or healing, studies have shown measurable effects in the physical world. Experiments on group meditation have demonstrated reductions in crime rates, improved health outcomes, and even changes in local weather patterns. These phenomena are often dismissed as coincidences, but they make sense in a participatory universe where consciousness influences reality.

The participatory nature of reality also challenges us to think differently about the challenges we face as a species. Climate change, social inequality and conflict are often seen as external problems. But what if they are reflections of our collective consciousness? What if the way we observe and participate in the world influences these outcomes?

If Wheeler's theory is correct, then solving these problems isn't just about changing external circumstances, it's about changing the way we see and engage with reality. But let's bring this back to you.

If reality is participatory, then your role is far more significant than you might realize. Every thought you have, every decision you make, every way you choose to observe the world, contributes to the unfolding of existence.

This isn't just a philosophical idea, it's a profound responsibility. You are not just living in the universe, you are helping to create it. And here's the ultimate question. If you're already shaping reality without realizing it, what could you achieve if you became fully conscious of this process? Could you transform your life, your relationships, or even the world around you by observing and participating with intention?

The evidence suggests that you can. And if that's true, then what's stopping us from taking full ownership of our role as co-creators of reality? If reality is participatory, then what kind of system are we participating in? Could it be that the universe itself is not a collection of inert, random particles, but a living, dynamic organism, a system of consciousness woven into the very fabric of existence?

Wheeler's participatory anthropic principle hints at this possibility, challenging us to reconsider not only our place in the cosmos, but the nature of the cosmos itself.

Imagine for a moment that the universe is alive, not in the biological sense we associate with life, but in a deeper, more profound way. Wheeler's view of the universe as a participatory process suggests that it is not a static object, but a feedback loop of observation and existence.

In this view, the universe doesn't merely exist for us to observe. It exists because we observe. Every act of observation, every choice, every moment of awareness contributes to the ongoing creation of reality. This idea resonates with ancient teachings. Many spiritual traditions have long described the cosmos as a living entity, imbued with intelligence and purpose.

Indigenous cosmologies often speak of the earth, the sky and the stars as conscious beings, each playing a role in the greater whole. Similarly, hermetic philosophy teaches that the universe is mental in nature, a reflection of a vast, interconnected mind.

The principle of correspondence as above, so below, implies that the structure of the universe mirrors the structure of our own consciousness. But how does this align with modern science?

Consider the idea of self-organization in complex systems. From the formation of galaxies to the growth of a single cell, the universe demonstrates an extraordinary ability to organize itself into patterns and structures.

These processes are not random. They are guided by principles that suggest an underlying intelligence. The laws of physics, the constants of nature, the emergence of life, all point to a universe that behaves less like a machine and more like a living system.

Wheeler's concept of, it from bit, further supports this perspective.

If everything in the universe arises from immaterial information rather than physical matter, then the foundation of reality is more akin to thought than to substance. In this sense, the universe is not a collection of things but a network of relationships, a web of information shaped by the act of participation.

But what does it mean for the universe to be alive? To answer this, we must expand our understanding of life itself. Life is not just biological, it's a process of interaction, adaptation and creation.

In this sense, the universe is alive in the way it continually responds to and evolves through our participation. Every thought, every observation, every intention becomes part of this vast living system, contributing to its ongoing development.

This participatory process also suggests that we are not separate from the universe. We are integral to it. Just as cells in a body work together to sustain life, we, as conscious beings, play a role in sustaining the universe's unfolding.

This interconnectedness challenges the idea of individuality. If the universe is a living system, then we are not isolated entities. We are expressions of the same consciousness that animates the cosmos. This brings us to the question of death. In a universe that is alive and participatory, what does it mean to die?

If existence is a process of observation and interaction, then death might not be an end, but a transformation, a shift in the way we participate. Just as a leaf falls from a tree and becomes part of the earth, our consciousness may continue in a different form, contributing to the universal system in ways we cannot yet comprehend.

Ancient traditions have long described death in similar terms. In Hermeticism, death is seen as a return to the source, a reabsorption into the universal mind. Eastern philosophies, such as Buddhism and Hinduism, speak of reincarnation and the cycle of samsara, where consciousness moves through different forms and experiences.

These teachings suggest that life and death are not opposites but parts of a greater whole, a continuous process of transformation within the living universe. If the universe is alive, then what role do we play in its evolution?

Wheeler's insights suggest that our participation is not passive, it is creative. Every thought we have, every action we take, every way we observe and interpret the world contributes to the universe's unfolding. This means that we are not just inhabitants of the cosmos, we are co-creators. But this also raises a profound responsibility.

If our participation shapes reality, then what kind of reality are we creating? Are we acting with intention, or are we allowing unconscious patterns to dictate the world around us? The participatory nature of the universe invites us to become more aware of our role in shaping existence. It challenges us to align our thoughts, actions, and intentions with the principles of harmony and balance that sustain life. Consider this.

When we act with awareness and purpose, we contribute to the universe's evolution in meaningful ways. When we cultivate compassion, creativity, and understanding, we enrich the living system of which we are a part.

Conversely, when we act out of fear, greed, or ignorance, we create discord that ripples through the fabric of reality. This isn't just a spiritual idea, it's a practical truth that we can see in the impact of our choices on ourselves, our communities, and the planet.

If we embrace our role as co-creators, what might we achieve? Could we create a world that reflects the interconnectedness and intelligence of the universe itself? Could we transcend the illusion of separation and live in harmony with the living system of which we are a part? These questions are not just philosophical, they are a call to action.

The universe, as Wheeler envisioned it, is not a finished product, but an ongoing creation, and we are part of that creation whether we realize it or not. Every moment, every observation, every choice contributes to the unfolding of reality. This means that the evidence of a living universe isn't just out there. It's within us. We are the universe observing itself, participating in its own evolution.

But if the universe is alive, then what does that say about us? Are we merely participants, or are we something more? Could it be that the consciousness we experience is a microcosm of the universal consciousness? If so, then the boundaries between the individual and the cosmos begin to blur, revealing a profound truth.

We are not separate from the universe. We are the universe.

If the universe is alive and we are co-creators of reality, then what does this mean for how we live our lives? What untapped potential lies within us waiting to be awakened? John Wheeler's participatory anthropic principle reveals a truth both astonishing and empowering. Reality doesn't happen to us. We actively shape it. But how can we harness this power consciously? Think about the implications.

If our thoughts, observations, and actions influence the unfolding of the universe, then every moment is an opportunity to create. Every decision we make is a brushstroke on the canvas of existence. Yet, so much of our participation is unconscious. We react to the world instead of actively shaping it.

What if we shifted that dynamic? What if we approached life with the intention to co-create something meaningful, harmonious, and aligned with the principles of the living universe? This idea isn't new. Mystical traditions and ancient teachings have long spoken of the power of conscious participation.

The Hermetic principle of mentalism, for example, asserts that the all is mind. In other words, the universe itself is a mental construct shaped by thought and intention. When we align our minds with the universal consciousness, we begin to access deeper levels of creativity and transformation. Modern science is starting to catch up with these ancient insights.

Neuroscience, for instance, has shown that our thoughts and emotions can physically reshape the brain. Practices like meditation and visualization activate neural pathways that influence not only how we perceive the world but how we interact with it. Quantum physics, too, supports the idea that observation shapes reality. Together, these disciplines point to a profound truth.

The way we focus our consciousness matters. But this raises a question. How can we consciously participate in a universe that is so vast, so intricate, and so mysterious? The first step is awareness. We must begin to see ourselves not as separate individuals navigating an external world, but as integral parts of a participatory process.

This shift in perspective changes everything. It transforms the way we approach relationships, work, creativity, and even our understanding of life and death. Consider the ripple effect of your thoughts and actions. Every word you speak, every decision you make, every way you choose to observe the world sends ripples through the fabric of reality.

When you act with kindness, you contribute to a field of harmony that affects not only your immediate surroundings, but the larger system of which you are a part. When you focus on gratitude, you align yourself with the principles of abundance and flow. These aren't just abstract ideas. They are tangible ways to engage with the participatory nature of reality. This perspective also helps us navigate challenges.

In a participatory universe, obstacles aren't just random occurrences. They are opportunities for growth and transformation. When we face adversity, we are invited to engage with it consciously, to see it not as a setback, but as a part of the creative process. This doesn't mean denying difficulty or pain. It means approaching it with the awareness that our responses shape what comes next. But what about the larger picture?

If we are co-creators, then our collective participation has the power to shape the trajectory of humanity and the planet. Climate change, inequality and conflict aren't just external problems. They are reflections of the collective consciousness.

When we observe and act unconsciously, we contribute to cycles of harm and separation. But when we participate with intention, we have the power to create a reality that reflects the interconnectedness and intelligence of the universe. This is why conscious participation is not just a personal practice. It's a collective responsibility.

Imagine what could happen if groups of people focused their consciousness on shared intentions. Studies on group meditation have already shown remarkable results, from reducing crime rates to fostering peace. These experiments reveal a glimpse of what is possible when we align our collective awareness with the principles of harmony and balance. So, how can you start participating consciously?

One of the most accessible tools is meditation. By quieting the mind and focusing your awareness, you can begin to observe the subtle ways your thoughts and intentions shape your reality.

Visualization is another powerful practice. When you imagine a desired outcome with clarity and emotion, you are not just dreaming. You are participating in the process of creation.

Gratitude, too, is a transformative tool. By focusing on what you appreciate, you align yourself with the energy of abundance and possibility. But conscious participation isn't just about personal practices, it's about how we engage with the world.

Every interaction is an opportunity to co-create. When you approach a conversation with empathy, you create a space for understanding and connection. When you act with integrity, you contribute to a field of trust and respect. These small, everyday choices are the building blocks of a participatory reality. And what about the ultimate question?

Death

If Wheeler's insights are correct, then death is not an end, but a transformation. It is a shift in the way we participate in the universe.

Just as life emerges through observation, death may simply be a new way of observing, a new way of participating. This perspective can change the way we approach our mortality. Instead of fearing the unknown, we can embrace it as part of the creative process, trusting that our consciousness continues to contribute to the living system of the cosmos.

The idea that we are co-creators in a living universe is both humbling and empowering. It reminds us that we are part of something far greater than ourselves, yet it also places incredible power in our hands.

Every thought, every action, every way we choose to observe and interact with the world matters.

We are not passive inhabitants of a pre-existing reality. We are participants in its unfolding. So what kind of reality do you want to create? What intentions will you set? How will you use your consciousness to contribute to the evolution of the universe?

These questions are not just philosophical, they are deeply practical.

They invite us to live with purpose, to act with intention, and to embrace our role as co-creators. The evidence is everywhere. In the quantum experiments that reveal the power of observation, in the ancient teachings that describe the interconnectedness of all things, and in the small, everyday moments where our thoughts and actions shape the world around us.

The universe is alive, and we are its participants.

The question is, will you participate consciously? To explore these ideas further and unlock tools for conscious creation, click the link on the screen or find it in the comments.

If this video resonated with you, let us know by commenting, “I understood it”.

Another decent summary of the concept(s):

Neville Goddard on using your imagination to re-create reality, John Wheeler style:

Aether Pirates of the Matterium!

Clif High on imagination creating our “event stream” (Note: Clif specifically mentions Neville Goddard above)

KARMA WARS!

a year ago · 318 likes · clif high

transcriptions 4 study","publication_logo_url":"https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe6965c83-7c6b-415b-8988-b28b65929f10_256x256.png","title":"Escaping the matrix through awareness ","truncated_body_text":null,"date":"2025-06-06T20:22:21.329Z","like_count":0,"comment_count":0,"bylines":[{"id":178188648,"name":"Dennis promoting Mark Passio","handle":"whatonearthishappening","previous_name":"Mark Passio","photo_url":"https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F68fac3e3-c354-4621-b89c-fb41c5842f77_600x338.gif","bio":"I took Mark Passio's \"How To Become The True Media\" seminar. I decided to make his work more available to readers, because Mark only does audiovisual presentations. I haven't met Mark, but respect his work enough to translate it into text on substack","profile_set_up_at":"2023-10-28T16:46:10.572Z","reader_installed_at":"2024-09-13T18:47:47.176Z","publicationUsers":[{"id":2067468,"user_id":178188648,"publication_id":2065097,"role":"admin","public":true,"is_primary":true,"publication":{"id":2065097,"name":"What on earth is happening (WOEIH) -> transcriptions 4 study","subdomain":"whatonearthishappening","custom_domain":"www.whatonearthishappening.wtf","custom_domain_optional":false,"hero_text":"Mark Passio's work in written AND audiovisual form.","logo_url":"https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/e6965c83-7c6b-415b-8988-b28b65929f10_256x256.png","author_id":178188648,"primary_user_id":178188648,"theme_var_background_pop":"#6C0095","created_at":"2023-10-28T16:47:12.939Z","email_from_name":null,"copyright":"Dennis Gilmour","founding_plan_name":null,"community_enabled":true,"invite_only":false,"payments_state":"disabled","language":null,"explicit":false,"homepage_type":"newspaper","is_personal_mode":false}},{"id":2722067,"user_id":178188648,"publication_id":872122,"role":"admin","public":true,"is_primary":false,"publication":{"id":872122,"name":"WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning","subdomain":"theredpilloftruth","custom_domain":"www.writepharmaparablepublishing.com","custom_domain_optional":false,"hero_text":"Parabolic teaching stories about simulation theory, Gnosticism, covid-19, New World Order psychopaths, and the UFO-spirituality-God connection regarding ancient mysteries-religion-evolution linkage(s)","logo_url":"https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/cc679e00-75e8-43e9-b005-067971066f0c_700x700.png","author_id":89344047,"primary_user_id":89344047,"theme_var_background_pop":"#67BDFC","created_at":"2022-05-02T05:36:54.519Z","email_from_name":"WritePharma Parable Publishing","copyright":"Dennis Gilmour","founding_plan_name":"Founding Member","community_enabled":true,"invite_only":false,"payments_state":"disabled","language":null,"explicit":false,"homepage_type":"newspaper","is_personal_mode":false}}],"is_guest":false,"bestseller_tier":null}],"utm_campaign":null,"belowTheFold":true,"type":"podcast","language":"en","source":null}" data-component-name="EmbeddedPostToDOM">

What on earth is happening (WOEIH) -> transcriptions 4 study

Escaping the matrix through awareness

a year ago · Dennis promoting Mark Passio

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Initial post on medium's Gary Welz

The parable of, "It's NOT a wonderful life when you realize they're programming your mind"

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Sun, 29 Dec 2024 19:38:58 GMT

Is “It’s a Wonderful Life” Really a Reincarnation Trap movie?

Is the Frank Capra Christmas classic, It’s a Wonderful Life an example of Reincarnation Trap or Simulation Theory cinema? There are several hints that this film, like Groundhog Day, The Truman Show and The Matrix may have a subliminal reincarnation/simulation theme.

Consider Capra’s character of the angel named Clarence Oddbody. Clarence is commanded by two entities in the stars named Joseph and Franklin. We assume they are high-ranking angels, but could they actually be agents, like Agent Smith in The Matrix, of an incarnation/reincarnation cycle for human souls? Like Ned Ryerson in Groundhog Day, Clarence might be thought of as an agent or “archon.” He refers to himself as an Angel Second Class. He has been sent by his superiors to help George Baily, a man struggling with his own existence, who is “discouraged” in the words of Joseph. But discouraged about what, exactly?

Clarence studies George’s life story and as his guardian angel, he is sent down to earth in response to the prayers of George and others. Clarence first appears on earth when he jumps into the river in front of George when he is about to commit suicide. By forcing George to rescue him, Clarence prevents George from killing himself. But apparently it wasn’t enough for Clarence to simply prevent George’s suicide, he must also give him an attitude adjustment. This is important, because Clarence’s work might have been finished at this point and the movie would be over, but Clarence needs to do something more.

When he and Clarence are drying out in the bridge toll-taker’s shed George acknowledges that he wanted to commit suicide. But he quickly agrees that this would be painful for the people he loves and instead wishes that “he had never been born.” Clarence says, “You mustn’t say things like that.”

Clarence realizes at that moment that George has a special problem, i.e. questioning the value of human existence, and asks his superiors for help. They agree to grant George’s wish and let him see what the world would have been like if he had never been born. Clarence, like the ghost of Christmas future in Charles Dicken’s Christmas Carol, takes George on a journey into a hypothetical world — one into which George had never been born. George is shown all the misfortune that will come to his town and loved ones because he wasn’t there to, for example, save his brother from drowning or prevent the pharmacist from accidentally poisoning someone or Bedford Falls from becoming a decadent town named Pottersville filled with bars, dance halls and bowling alleys and his former wife Mary Hatch an anxious old spinster.

Clarence’s alternate life review, or “non-life review” only shows the potential bad outcomes from George Bailey’s never being born. It never admits that some things might have worked out for the better. Maybe the brother Harry never goes to the frozen pond and doesn’t drown. Maybe Mary marries Sam Wainwright and lives happily ever after. The alternative Bedford Falls scenario is only a way to persuade George to agree to his incarceration. He can’t be allowed to believe the heresy that he and the world might really be fine or even better if he did not incarnate according to plan. George is persuaded by his own ego to believe that he is indispensable. He is, in reality, a self-righteous, virtue-signaling do-gooder who believes that he is responsible for the well-being of everyone in Bedford Falls. This is Clarence’s trap; he preys upon George’s narcissism. George is thus persuaded to want his life again and when he returns to it his problems are solved as if by magic. In truth, all it took was Mary making a few calls to get enough money to cover the $8,000 bank deposit lost by Uncle Billy and pocketed by mean old Potter. Only a narcissist would attempt suicide over such a small problem instead of asking for help.

Clarence never reveals any alternative to life on earth. The possibility of his not being born implies George’s soul exists outside of his Bedford Falls life. But where and how? Does he really have a choice to be on earth or not? Who, if anyone, really benefits from George’s life? Is George’s soul playing a role in a simulation populated by non-player characters, aka NPCs, portraying the denizens of Bedford Falls? Is this world controlled by the angels/archons like Joseph, Franklin and Clarence in service of a gnostic demiurge, malign AI or intergalactic TV producer?

Clarence, like Ned Ryerson in Groundhog Day, keeps a soul from leaving the reincarnation cycle. Jimmy Stewart’s George Bailey takes the reverse arc of Bill Murray’s Phil Connor. Phil, rather like Scrooge, reforms from his life of selfishness and decadence. He perfects himself to win the heart of Rita and the love and admiration of everyone in Punxsutawney whereas George is made to appreciate the goodness that his lifetime of self-sacrifice and virtuous behavior has brought to Bedford Falls. Ned lassoes a flagrant sinner and puts him in hell while Clarence reels in a doubting saint and returns him to heaven.

In each story, a woman they love at first sight is an important part of the lure. Mary Hatch and Rita may be NPCs. Or perhaps they are also embodied souls who are willing participants, like the actress playing Truman’s wife Meryl, motivated by their own interests — deals they have themselves made with their respective devils and angels. The two love interests in The Truman Show are the twin poles of attraction, Meryl binding him to Sea Haven and Lauren, the fired and free actress luring him out to freedom.

The parallels between Ned and Clarence include the allusions to their each being seemingly incompetent or new at what they do. Clarence gets his wings and Ned has the “greatest day of his life” when each accomplishes the goal of getting their assignment to explicitly agree to the choice that will continue their roles in the reincarnation cycle. Phil must sign the contract for “Single Premium” Life Insurance and George must explicitly demand to be returned to his life. Oddly, Truman sells life insurance and never agrees to life in Sea Haven — but after all, he is the only one who escapes.

Some other peculiar things that these films share:

George, like Truman is frequently immersed in water. Immersion is a symbol of baptism but can also be thought of as a memory wipe, a cleansing of the mind to prevent an awareness of the repeating cycles of entrapment. George gets wet in four scenes.

1. When rescuing Harry in the frozen pond.

2. Falling into the swimming pool beneath the dance floor at the graduation dance where George meets Mary and notices her adult beauty.

3. In the torrential rainstorm on George and Mary’s wedding night.

4. When jumping into the river to save Clarence.

Phil Connor’s stepping into the icy puddle is his baptism into the hellscape set in motion by Ned.

There are multiple scenes of George almost leaving town and being pulled back. This parallels Phil’s many attempts to leave Punxsutawney in Groundhog Day and Truman’s repeated attempts to leave Sea Haven for Fiji, the last known location of Lauren his romantic alternative to Meryl, the producer’s choice for his wife. Rewatching the film, I was struck by how many times George is frustrated in his attempts to leave Bedford Falls and list them here.

1. George, brandishing travel brochures for exotic destinations, gets a new suitcase at age 21 and is planning to leave town when his dad has a stroke and dies, and he is pulled back to take care of his family.

2. Three months later, after giving up his trip to Europe to help with the family business, George attends a final meeting of the S&L board of directors and resigns from this position to go off to college. But Potter attempts to close the company and George is forced by the board to stay on and manage it. So, Harry goes to college in George’s place.

3. Four years later, George, still carrying his brochures, plans to leave for jobs in faraway places when his younger brother Harry returns home from college, but Harry has gotten married and is offered a job with his new father-in-law, so George sacrifices his future plans and stays on at the S&L.

4. At the end of the celebration of Harry’s marriage, George hears a train whistle and remembers his dreams, but he is drawn back by his mother who tells him about the attraction Mary feels for him and that she otherwise might marry Sam Wainwright. George goes for a walk on which he meets and propositions the hot, flirty Violet Bick who rejects his wildly romantic and racy proposal because she doesn’t want to walk 10 miles out of town to a mountaintop with him. He bashfully walks to Mary’s house where he paces in front of her gate until she invites him in. He again expresses his desire to get out of Bedford Falls, but in a few moments, he looks into her yearning eyes, breaks down crying and the next thing you see is them getting married.

5. George and Mary are in a taxi about to leave on their honeymoon trip when George sees a crowd of people making a run on Potter’s bank and goes back to prevent a run on the S&L. Mary offers their savings to save the business and sacrifice his dreams.

6. Even WW2 can’t get him out of town because Potter classifies him as 4F for the draft.

7. When George tries to kill himself, he goes to the bridge at the end of town and attempts to commit suicide but even then, he can’t get out of Bedford Falls.

Truman’s town of Sea Haven is surrounded by water, and he has a deep fear of crossing water as a result of a childhood boating accident that resulted in his father’s death. Despite that, after many failed attempts to leave he puts a stuffed dummy in his bed, runs from his home, takes out a sailboat and sails away. He defies the show’s creator Christof’s attempt to get him to return by creating a storm. When Truman is tossed overboard, he climbs back aboard, ties himself into the boat and explicitly speaks for the first time to the unseen rulers of his realm; “You’re gonna to have to kill me.” Christof does go all out to actually kill him by raising waves to capsize the boat, but Truman miraculously survives.

In his final attempt to persuade Truman to stay Christof addresses him like God from the clouds announcing that he is the “creator of a television show.” Truman is told that he is the star of a show that “gives hope and joy and inspiration to millions.” Truman, unlike Phil or George, cannot be bribed or guilt-tripped into remaining a captive soul. He defies Christof’s condescending pleas to stay and leaves to the unheard cheers of the TV audience that has been on the edge of their seats. Truman walks through the door marked EXIT to a world he has never known.

Are these the kinds of challenges our own souls will need to overcome after death to escape our own reincarnations traps? This suggests that few souls do escape and those who do must leave on their own and by their own unique exit.

Roger Elbert’s Dying Words

I doubt that the creators of these films deliberately intended them to be about the Reincarnation Trap or Simulation Theory, but there they are, like Dark City, The Adjustment Bureau and They Live movies that suggest that our perceived reality is not the true one. They reveal to us that it may be necessary to escape this realm, like Truman Burbank, to a reality we do not know and can barely imagine.

This website author’s sidebar: the creators of these films may not be aware of the various depths of possible interpretation(s) of their works (for awakened minds), but they definitely intend their work to program on some level.

Mind control in America

Modern-day MK-Ultra

Apropos of this, here’s a death bed statement of the late film critic Roger Ebert reported by his widow, Chaz Ebert:

“But the day before he passed away, he wrote me a note: ‘This is all an elaborate hoax.’ I asked him, ‘What’s a hoax?’ And he was talking about this world, this place. He said it was all an illusion. I thought he was just confused. But he was not confused. He wasn’t visiting heaven, not the way we think of heaven. He described it as a vastness that you can’t even imagine. It was a place where the past, present, and future were happening all at once.”

References:

I have been inspired by a Reddit post about Groundhog Day by SuperConductiveRabbi, Groundhog Day: Ned Ryerson is the devil and a blog post by Howdie Mickoski Phil’s Deal in the movie Groundhog Day

Here are three excellent related articles:

Film Theory: Groundhog Day is hell and Ned Ryerson is the devil

Groundhog Day’s Most Sinister Theory Casts Ned Ryerson in a Devilish Role

This Goundhog Day fan theory might change how you see the film forever

The seminal contemporary work on the reincarnation trap is the book Exit the Cave: Ending the Reincarnation Trap, Book 1 by Howdie Mickoski.

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

An interesting way to describe the truman-atrix

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Tue, 24 Dec 2024 22:16:08 GMT

The title says it all.

Another similar and interesting video below:

Yet another intriguing video below:

Solipsism explained:

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

A brief explanation of the Truman-atrix

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:52:55 GMT

Cory Endrulat is doing some great work helping to end human slavery. We briefly talk about the truman-atrix, decentralized freedom, food security, decentralized tech communications like qortal platform, a little bit about evolution of consciousness, and other solutions to fix “WTF on Earth is Happening”.

Deeper Truman-atrix explanation: I consider my illusory reality to be like a combination of The Truman Show movie, and The Matrix movie. I’m Truman in my own illusory matrix reality. Everything around me is illusion. I’m always in a one-player game, but it can be multi-player, while still always being single player.

Technological analogy: an avatar in a game is a tech illusion that a real human, in the real world, manipulates. My avatar in the game is simply residual self-image, the mental projection of my digital self, as Morpheus told Neo. My own body even is not real, so for sure even other legitimate human avatars are the same stuff. The only thing real here is you and me. Only our consciousness is true, assuming the one reading this is a legit human being. There are NPCs too, which is a complicating factor.

But nonetheless, ALL around me, including me, is illusion. AIX (...see this Archaix post for more details about AIX...) is the “central server” that can (...and does, IMHO...) intercept communications & interactions and some approximation of interactions gets through to any other true human I’m interacting with (...assuming the one reading this is human in the way I’m trying to describe...). So, my avatar interacts with “illusion-reader-avatar”, and the digital information gets transmitted to the central server AIX, which transmits some approximate to the human reading this, both of us playing the same “game”. We are both real in the real world (ie spirit world) and yet we’re both not real at all, in illusory earth-reality. So, I hope I’m getting the idea across that I’m always in one-player mode in truman-atrix-world-game. And sometimes it can also be multi-player mode, while still in one-player mode.

Biological analogy: I’m asleep in my bed but locked in a “Vulcan mind meld” with a buddy sleeping in his house down the street. Because Vulcans can mentally connect & bond with others, Spock can project an illusory avatar into my Vulcan mind, while I sleep. Spock’s avatar is simply my mind, using my mind to communicate to myself. It is ALL me, and yet it’s not totally me, as Spock can spin up an interactive avatar, as we communicate and do things in imagination-land. And vice-versa.

Of course, in this analogy, AIX could be likened to an insane Vulcan that knows it cannot totally stop Vulcans from mental telepathy, so it intercepts mental communications while Spock and I sleep, to warp and distort communications & interactions. I could even kill Spock in my dream (...or vice versa...) and he doesn’t really die, as neither of us is in any real danger. His consciousness projection would simply return to him and he’d probably wake up in the real world. Maybe I would too, since I killed another Vulcan. 🙂 Perhaps the rogue Vulcan has certain abilities to put an awakening Vulcan back to sleep really fast, to maintain control in dreamland, similar to Freddy Krueger, who had superior abilities in the dream state.

August 19, 2025 update of section name to “Toroidal Truman-atrix”

Full Cory Endrulat interview below:

Original clip on youtube

Cory’s website: www.theliberator.us

A short story to illustrate a Gnostic theory about how our simulated reality came into existence, reason(s) for trauma, and the good that will ultimately come from it:

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Full video in Personal Podcasts

The parable of, "The value of a good 'Father'"

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Mon, 30 Sep 2024 17:08:37 GMT

In the entry video, Captain Janeway from Star Trek Voyager was being tempted by her “father” to go to the light, after she had died on a planet. I decided to create this post after Sonja and I briefly discussed this Star Trek episode. Clip below.

This clip demonstrates the mechanism that Archons (ie demons) use to gain control of the human soul at or before death, through manipulation into an agreement. They have no real power beyond manipulating people into an agreement with them, and their purpose is to trap souls, to then feed off of them in the reincarnation cycle. "Coda" is the 57th episode of Star Trek: Voyager, the 15th episode of the third season.

Captain Janeway’s independent resistance to the evil impostor reminds me of the strong female lead in the below parable, who also had to individually resist deceptive pressure. Without consent, the Archons have NO power:

A few bullet points about my take on the clip:

Captain Janeway (ie one of Originator-Creator-Oversoul's errant-elect) starts to discern her reality is fake, and flips between "reality" and "simulation" and struggles sometimes to tell the difference. She perceives her crewmates encouraging her to fight. At some point, every human errant-elect starts to experience something similar, something akin to personal supernatural revelations & experiences & synchronicities. We start to develop our spiritual senses, and we begin to realize Janeway's "fake reality" is much like our human 5 sense reality.
Janeway has to learn to engage critical thinking skills and ask good questions, and question everything, to discern her fake simulated world. True human errant-elect must too. We must subjectively prove the supernatural nature of our 5 sense "reality" to ourselves at least, and try to help others in our own way when we are ready.
As the clip hints, the Archons must get us to agree to some vague agreement to "go with them", symbolically representing your individual lies that you must work through with Originator-Creator-Oversoul before physical death and transition. It is personal in many ways, though there are some common elements. Being deceived too much and "going with them" into lies and hell itself is a common theme.
The "crew" represents SophiaChristos, and the other manifestations of elect.
1) Angel class (implementing truth)
2) ~~Demon class (countering & destroying truth)~~ [elected to hell, but still elect nonetheless, albeit in a negative sense]
3) Errant-elect-male class, "Christos" (broadcasting truth)
4) Errant-elect-female class, "Wife/Wives of 'Christos', aka 'Sophia'" (receiving truth)
5) Father God class, manifestations that baffle the entirety of creation and baffle ALL classes of sentient beings
They will intermittently break through and reveal their efforts to "save" you. It is supernatural. You will know.
Janeway must discern the truth and make the right choice. Failure to do so means she will end up deceived and voluntarily follow her "father the devil" into hell. In the episode, Janeway's "father" pretends to try to help her make this choice, but he is actually a deceptive alien. Since he is a liar, he represents the devil.
Being mindful of our thoughts, paying attention, and staying in the present moment is important to discern these moments when the "crew" will supernaturally reveal themselves and their efforts to "save" you. They will encourage you to fight in various ways.
At the end of the clip, Captain Janeway's "father" reveals he is a deceptive "alien" (ie errant-elect come to understand the significance of the demonic Archons and their deceptive HAL simulation tech).
It is common to get confused and think our father the devil is the same as our Heavenly Father.
Janeway's "father's" deceptions, if believed, would have resulted in her consciousness living on (ie reincarnating---this link has more Biblical details about this concept) after physical death to serve the demonic Archons like food.
Janeway's "father" says the captain is very stubborn, and this quality eventually manifests fully in a human errant-elect as our resolve to complete the mystery of Originator-Creator-Oversoul cannot be contained.
- Note: This stubbornness is evidence that this is your last incarnation. Those destined to reincarnate don't care about these things, or can't understand them, or understand a little but forget quickly.
At the end of this clip, the devil makes the empty threat that Janeway will eventually go to his hellish matrix. This is just frustration. The devil and/or Archons cannot reincarnate you beyond your last flesh life. You will know. These words I write will leap out as simple confirmation in your spirit if you are already there, or well on your way.
Some more good videos talking about the soul trap:
More on near death experiences
Original video on youtube
Four above videos on "Sanity Machine"

Tony Sayers on youtube

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Original post in "Personal Podcasts"

The parable of, "Dennis chattin with Sonja Testerman of youtube's 'Tree of Knowledge' channel"

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Mon, 09 Sep 2024 22:44:09 GMT

CLICK IMAGE TO GO TO ORIGINAL POST IN “PERSONAL PODCASTS” SECTION

Derivative post below, from my conversation with Sonja Testerman:

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Original post on "Home" section

The parable of, "What if I told you ..."

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:50:22 GMT

CLICK IMAGE TO GO TO ORIGINAL POST ON “HOME” SECTION

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

The parable of, "Benedictine the Truth explaining the truman-atrix"

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Wed, 04 Sep 2024 04:30:39 GMT

Full video in Personal Podcasts

Benedictine does a pretty good job explaining the truman-atrix, so I won’t bother commenting very much.

At about 19 minutes into the video, he starts talking about solipsism, which is sort of like the truman-atrix, except that I say people in your “dream-reality” can be real people, in the way I try to describe below.

Other than the idea that solipsism generally says people are not real, he points out some good positives to living with a solipsistic philosophy.

In the short clip, I attempt to explain how people are both real & unreal. :-)

I’ll leave it at that, and suggest my readers watch Benedictine’s entire video for context. Also, I suggest the entire video of Sonja and I chatting is good context.

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Shocking QUANTUM Discovery: Are You TRAPPED in a SIMULATION?

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Thu, 30 May 2024 19:15:28 GMT

My truman-atrix-plus idea is about sending approximate symbolic communications through the 5 sense barrier, to be translated to another sentient being in ways I cannot know precisely, just like two sleeping dreamers, connected through a “Vulcan mind-meld” would be in their own realities BUT ALSO subconsciously modifying each other’s dream in approximate ways, because each mind would decode/interpret the symbolism differently.

I don’t think Morgue adequately explored the distinction between the truman-atrix (one player simulated reality) and the truman-atrix-plus (multi-player simulated reality). He only briefly mentions that our dreaming state while asleep at night is like our individual reality (ie truman-atrix) and our dreaming state while awake during the day is like creating our shared reality (sort of like the truman-atrix-plus but not quite).

Nonetheless, Morgue provides a good introductory video to the various concepts regarding the simulation hypothesis, and the associated quantum physics ideas. It might be a bit heavy for some.

Morgue mentioned metaphysical reality is a mathematical mental reality based on immaterial frequencies, so our reality is:

dreamlike because it’s mind (immaterial mental frequencies)
code-like because it’s structured through eternal mathematical law, which is code-like
holographic because these frequencies form an interference pattern that project the dimensional dream reality that we inhabit together

So, the various analogies to simulation theory/simulation reality contain ALL the analogies, as they are all valid: dream, hologram, code directing the hologram projections. Could there be truth to the below video that our earth is a type of motherboard that powers our holographic illusory world, and perhaps that is why so many people are entranced by the system and can’t see & understand WTF on Earth is Happening?

Incredibly, many around the world STILL have no idea WTF on Earth is Happening, so perhaps this post below can help educate. In addition to Reiner Fuellmich below, here in Canada, there are many Covid political prisoners & persecutions too: Tamara Lich, and Art Pawloski, and the Coutts three, etc…

Who is Robert Malone

The Persecution of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

DR. REINER FUELLMICH - A POLITICAL PRISONER…

2 years ago · 286 likes · 40 comments · Robert W Malone MD, MS

However, I still say Covid is one small symptom of a much bigger disease, that my site tries to expose. Nonetheless, I hope this information might inspire people to do their own research, which is the only way anybody can be convinced personally.

Anyway, back to Morgue’s video. :-) I thought the Rubik’s cube analogy about how zero is a structure of positive and negative values was interesting. So, the cube can recombine into many different realities/combinations, while maintaining zero, which is nothingness, which cannot be created or destroyed, like energy itself, so it is eternal, as are we. We are the Absolute! I AM! I AM the absolute, and YOU ARE the absolute, together making the WE ARE the absolute, networked nodal minds.

As Morgue says, the bedrock of reality then is based on ZERO, an immaterial existence that has eternal existence that is a structure of nothingness that is exploring all the different patterns that it can take on while maintaining being nothing.

As a former programmer, I know it would be extremely difficult to create a complex program AND ALSO make sure the sum of every underlying bit adds up to zero. All computer operations boil down to binary digits of 0 or 1, which represent the on or off state of allowing electricity to flow through a transistor, a tiny physical device that acts like a digital switch in computers. The transistor turns on when enough electricity flows through and stays off otherwise. The microchips in our computers contain billions of these tiny on-off transistor switches.

An aside:

There is a common idea these days that so-called “5D” reality is sort of like the ideal heavenly realm that we want to go to when we die. I think that would entail dangers. 1 = true in the digital computer system, and 0 = false, as all computer code reduces down to zeros and ones.

No computer we know of has base 10 code (unless they have quantum computers already that can somehow access computation beyond the base 2 numbering system called binary). It is only 0 or 1, aka base 2 binary number coding. Not 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, which would be base 10 coding, which would be exponentially complex computer code that I suspect only the Originator-Creator-Oversoul could possibly understand.

I used to program computers and binary code is difficult enough to make right, as proven by the many bugs that ALL computer programs have and programmers have to be constantly fixing the bugs. Base 10 would be beyond even supposedly artificial intelligence large language models to make work.

If Morgue is correct in the above video that, “the bedrock of reality then is based on ZERO, an immaterial existence that has eternal existence that is a structure of nothingness that is exploring all the different patterns that it can take on while maintaining being nothing”, then maybe ONE is the only other state we should desire or think about.

In our inverted world, computers code bit 0 = false and bit 1 = true, but in true reality, based on ZERO (according to Morgue), bit 0 = true and bit 1 = false, because a reality based on ZERO is the true dimension we come from (ie we project from ZERO — the true dimension — INTO this digital simulated reality which requires ONE — the false dimension). Perhaps being in 1D eventually leads to 2D, 3D, 4D, etc... and get trapped into deeper layers of this false reality, as I believe in the soul trick theory, that we were likely tricked and/or forced into coming here in the first place (perhaps we made the choice naively due to lack of knowledge/experience as some Gnostics claim similarly for Sophia…many possibilities).

I rather think we should think in terms of 0D (0 dimension), instead of going to so-called 5D that people think is the thing. Even so-called 1D, which I call 1DD (1 dimensional depth) would encase dangers too, would it not?

If ZERO dimension is the prime reality of:

unconditional love
100% positive thoughts/emotions
100% positive intentions/motivations about everything/everybody
100% total knowledge of all things, and a non-duality existence

THEN it follows that the ONE dimension is any derivative reality that contains:

conditional love
percentage combinations of positive & negative thoughts/emotions (eg a psyche with 80% negative thoughts and 20% positive thoughts combined with 90% negative emotions and 10% positive emotions)
percentage combinations of positive & negative intentions/motivations about everything/everybody (eg a psychopath might have 99% negative intentions motivating him to deceive somebody and only 1% positive intentions, in his mind, thinking he might be doing some “good”)
partial knowledge about things, and a duality existence

I don't think we want 5D, which I call 5DDD (dimensional depths of deception), but rather 0D and 1DD only. Because 1DD can lead to 2DDD, 3DDD, 4DDD, 5DDD, etc… and you risk your consciousness falling into infinity dimensional depths of deception (ie the limbo concept from the movie “Inception”).

Perhaps that is why the matrix is breaking down, and there are glitches everywhere like Mandela effect, etc.... The more who wake up, the more the AI-Demiurge can't track and fix critical bugs. Full true freedom can only come if all divine sparks move to 0D (true unity, as the number 8 is a symbolic looping infinity containing two ZEROS — 8 bits makes a byte, in the computer world, and the "byte" will bite you in the rear and loop you back for another reincarnation, perhaps forever in limbo).

The entire AI-Demiurge-matrix system can be destroyed, with the correct knowledge. The traditional ideas of 1D and 2D also implies -1D and -2D, etc... encapsulating the black hole/white hole trap, that some have postulated we exist in.

Can You Stand The Truth The Chronicle Of Man's Imprisonment

5.75MB ∙ PDF file

Download

So, really, staying in 0D negates all that, because there is no -0D ... just food for thought. Detachment & disassociating, while maintaining empathy without fear, sounds right to me. Not even need 1DD, as in one "dimensional depth" is necessarily “good”, but I think it is the farthest that Originator-Creator-Oversoul ever wanted his creation(s) to venture.

End of aside

As for Morgue’s idea of the zeros and ones balancing out, in general, most computer programs don't necessarily "average" to zero in the sum of their bits. However, there are some interesting patterns and exceptions to consider:

Random bit patterns: In many cases, the bits in a computer program are randomly distributed, and the sum of these bits can be expected to converge to zero as the number of bits increases. This is because each bit has a 50% chance of being either 0 or 1, and the law of large numbers suggests that the average will approach zero as the number of trials (in this case, bits) increases.
Binary representations: When representing numbers using binary (base-2), many numbers have a natural tendency to be close to zero due to the way binary arithmetic works. For example, the average value of a set of random binary numbers is often close to zero because many numbers have an even number of 1s, which cancel out when added.
Program-specific behavior: Some programs may exhibit patterns that lead to an average value close to zero. For instance, if a program is designed to perform calculations that involve many small values, the sum of these values might be close to zero. However, this is not a general property of all computer programs.
Exceptions: There are some notable exceptions where the sum of bits in a program might not average to zero:

a. Cryptographic algorithms: In some cryptographic applications, such as hash functions or encryption algorithms, the goal is to produce a non-zero output that is difficult to predict or manipulate. In these cases, the sum of bits may not average to zero.

b. Program-specific properties: Certain programs may have specific properties or constraints that lead to an average value that is not zero. For example, some algorithms rely on the properties of prime numbers or other mathematical structures that don't necessarily average to zero.

c. Bugs or anomalies: In rare cases, a program may contain bugs or anomalies that cause the sum of bits to deviate significantly from zero.

In summary, while many computer programs may exhibit an average value close to zero due to random bit patterns or binary representations, this is not a universal property of all programs. The behavior of a program's bits depends on its specific design, implementation, and purpose.

I know the extremely complicated code that must be running our reality would be complex enough to require a super-intelligence to make sure the sum of every bit balances out to exactly zero.

More general info about Morgue’s philosophy, in the video below:

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

The parable of, "You are in a simulation but you're NOT supposed to know it"

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Sun, 26 May 2024 19:05:34 GMT

The video is pretty self explanatory, I think. Not much need to add more.

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

The parable of, "You are in a Simulation: Here's how to Exit it (Neville Goddard)"

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Sun, 26 May 2024 09:46:12 GMT

I will post the last few words of the video, where Neville’s words are translated a little for normal folk. :-)

In the later part of his life, Neville’s lectures and books were all about the promise, and not so much about the law of assumption, as Neville experienced the mystical experience of being born from above. In simple terms, it is when your spirit, that is God, becomes awake in you. The Christ is born in your skull.

And you finally see through this simulation. According to Neville, the promise is given to you regardless of what you do. The Christic powers will be awakened in you when you are ready for it, but till then you need to apply the law of assumption to build a perfect life for you, as we are here in this world to master the gift of speech and mind, imagination, as Hermes said. And only then will we be able to awaken the immortal within.

You see, in survival mode and in deprogramming of this simulation, the immortal cannot awake. So, you need to master your imagination first, to build a great life. Only then will you be able to have enough time and focus on receiving the promise. No soul that is lost in the trappings of this simulation is ready to be born from above. This is why Neville told the story of Jake and how death is not the end.

If you do not awake till the end of this lifetime you are restored back into this reality to do this all over again till you wake up. This is why Neville was so passionate about the promise in later years of his life. He knew how significant it was and how thrilling it was, but it turns off many people, as his way of teaching is very Biblical and Gnostic, but Neville openly admitted that he believed the Bible to be completely an allegorical and psychological drama and didn't believe in the historicity of it.

This is why I still quote verses from the Bible because the wisdom of Christ is profound. Because it is an amalgamation of much older spiritual texts like the Gnostic teachings of the Nag Hammadi library. Therefore, the blueprint to escape this simulation is still present in various scriptures of this world. You just need discernment to see what is profound and what is absurd.

You are the individualized spirit of God, wearing this garment of flesh and blood. Taking part in a game, a drama, a simulation. To experience the ecstasy of once again becoming one with God, after living through the horrors and limitations of this world.

But if you master the law, you become immune to the idea of second cause. And this is when you have made yourself ready to receive the promise. That is, the immortal rises from the skull.

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing-stories with mystical meaning

Original Thunderwizard video on youtube

Ramblin' man attempting to describe the Truman-atrix

Dennis (redpilloftruth.com) — Wed, 20 Mar 2024 06:03:52 GMT

Ramblin man above, who likes to call himself “Thunderwizard” rambles some truths about: Mandela effect, Gnostics, and why Gnosticism became prominent in early Christianity, prism/prison duality, false beings of light/Archons, we are deity, etc…

I thought his confusing mishmash about quantum physics was interesting, and how particles don't know how to manifest (black color, white, or both, or none, until focus, attention, time causes to collapse to something), except every nanosecond, when somebody looks at YOU then particle becomes something. Armchair physics is mostly about high level abstract imagination anyway. Hope my readers find it interesting to consider.

I added my own words to describe his meme: Director (Higher self, white light, Spirit, Power self), Observer (Lower self, dark prism, Soul, Shadow self), Actor (flesh self, one light frequency, body, mirror self). Different words can be abstract and flexible, I find, to inspire contemplation & meditation around interpolation of ideas & concepts.

David Icke has his unique way of saying similar things in these two videos.

The clip above can be found at spot 1 hour and 25 minutes in the below video, if people are curious to hear more of archaix’s similar take from ancient texts.

But, I found I really resonated with the lady below, when she described the loosh energy of creation, which either positive or negative can create our “reality”.

I will leave it to my readers to decide if any of this enhances and/or points to my theory of the “Truman-atrix”.

Share WritePharma Parable Publishing